A transparent, lightweight and sustainable Green Learning AI model for prostate cancer detection on MRI.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
224 patients had csPCa on PBx.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
3-T MRI and prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] A novel GL model fully automatically detects csPCa on prostate biparametric MRI with comparable performance to PI-RADS and DL. Combined with PI-RADS, GL significantly improves csPCa detection.
[OBJECTIVES] To develop a novel transparent and lightweight machine learning model, the Green Learning (GL), for automated prostate segmentation (PS) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)
- 표본수 (n) 483
- p-value P < 0.001
- p-value P = 0.02
APA
Kaneko M, Yang J, et al. (2026). A transparent, lightweight and sustainable Green Learning AI model for prostate cancer detection on MRI.. BJU international. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70203
MLA
Kaneko M, et al.. "A transparent, lightweight and sustainable Green Learning AI model for prostate cancer detection on MRI.." BJU international, 2026.
PMID
41749494 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVES] To develop a novel transparent and lightweight machine learning model, the Green Learning (GL), for automated prostate segmentation (PS) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) detection on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Men who underwent 3-T MRI and prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified. MRI was acquired and interpreted according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2 or 2.1. The GL was created to automate PS and csPCa detection on biparametric MRI. The performance was compared to the standard-of-care radiologists using PI-RADS, and a conventional deep learning (DL) U-Net model as benchmarking. The PS performance was evaluated by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The area under the curve (AUC) for patient-level csPCa detection was assessed. Model size and computational workload, measured by floating point operations (FLOPs), were reported.
[RESULTS] A total of 602 MRIs were randomly divided for training (N = 483) and testing (N = 119). Overall, 224 patients had csPCa on PBx. The median DSC for PS was higher for GL than U-Net (0.91 vs 0.88, P < 0.001). The AUC for csPCa detection of GL was similar to PI-RADS (0.75 vs 0.76, P = 0.8) and U-Net (vs 0.74, P = 0.3). A combination of GL and PI-RADS showed a higher AUC of 0.81 than PI-RADS alone (P = 0.02). Compared with U-Net, the GL had smaller magnitude parameters (1.21× 10 vs 177× 10) and less computational workload (9.8× 10 vs 1027× 10 FLOPs).
[CONCLUSION] A novel GL model fully automatically detects csPCa on prostate biparametric MRI with comparable performance to PI-RADS and DL. Combined with PI-RADS, GL significantly improves csPCa detection.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] Men who underwent 3-T MRI and prostate biopsy (PBx) were identified. MRI was acquired and interpreted according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2 or 2.1. The GL was created to automate PS and csPCa detection on biparametric MRI. The performance was compared to the standard-of-care radiologists using PI-RADS, and a conventional deep learning (DL) U-Net model as benchmarking. The PS performance was evaluated by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The area under the curve (AUC) for patient-level csPCa detection was assessed. Model size and computational workload, measured by floating point operations (FLOPs), were reported.
[RESULTS] A total of 602 MRIs were randomly divided for training (N = 483) and testing (N = 119). Overall, 224 patients had csPCa on PBx. The median DSC for PS was higher for GL than U-Net (0.91 vs 0.88, P < 0.001). The AUC for csPCa detection of GL was similar to PI-RADS (0.75 vs 0.76, P = 0.8) and U-Net (vs 0.74, P = 0.3). A combination of GL and PI-RADS showed a higher AUC of 0.81 than PI-RADS alone (P = 0.02). Compared with U-Net, the GL had smaller magnitude parameters (1.21× 10 vs 177× 10) and less computational workload (9.8× 10 vs 1027× 10 FLOPs).
[CONCLUSION] A novel GL model fully automatically detects csPCa on prostate biparametric MRI with comparable performance to PI-RADS and DL. Combined with PI-RADS, GL significantly improves csPCa detection.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
- Impact of magnetic resonance imaging visibility of prostate cancer on partial gland ablation.
- Re: Baris Turkbey, Henkjan Huisman, Andriy Fedorov, et al. Requirements for AI Development and Reporting for MRI Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-Naïve Men: PI-RADS Steering Committee, Version 1.0. Radiology 2025;315:e24014.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Whole-body MRI for staging and follow-up of primary musculoskeletal tumours: a systematic review.
- Nanotechnology-Assisted Molecular Profiling: Emerging Advances in Circulating Tumor DNA Detection.
- Artificial intelligence and breast cancer screening in Serbia: a dual-perspective qualitative study among radiologists and screening-aged women.
- Functional-based multi-omics early prediction of radiation pneumonitis in NSCLC using AI-generated perfusion and ventilation from planning CT.
- Multifocal anaplastic astrocytoma mimicking primary central nervous system lymphoma: A case report.