Refining the clinical utility of [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
23 patients with mCRPC who underwent Fluor-18 ([F]F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and subsequent tandem RLT.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Fluor-18 ([F]F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and subsequent tandem RLT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT may offer a safe, effective treatment option. Assessment of PSMA expression on pretherapeutic PET predicts response, supporting its use in guiding personalized treatment.
[PURPOSE] This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lutetium-177/Actinium-225 prostate-specific membrane antigen tandem radioligand therapy ([Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT) and to explore
- p-value P = 0.042
- p-value P = 0.036
- 95% CI 1.01-1.77
APA
Widjaja L, Hornfeck J, et al. (2026). Refining the clinical utility of [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 53(4), 2271-2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07632-1
MLA
Widjaja L, et al.. "Refining the clinical utility of [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.." European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, vol. 53, no. 4, 2026, pp. 2271-2281.
PMID
41174098
Abstract
[PURPOSE] This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lutetium-177/Actinium-225 prostate-specific membrane antigen tandem radioligand therapy ([Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT) and to explore clinical and imaging-based predictors of treatment response to support individualized patient selection.
[METHODS] This retrospective, single-center study included 23 patients with mCRPC who underwent Fluor-18 ([F]F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and subsequent tandem RLT. Whole-body tumor segmentation on PET/CT and standard laboratory values were acquired before treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was partial response (PR), defined as either a decline in prostate specific antigen of ≥ 50% (according to prostate cancer clinical trial working group) or PET-based response according to Response Evaluation Criteria on PSMA PET/CT. Safety assessment included renal and hematological side effects following common terminology criteria of adverse events version 5.
[RESULTS] Following two cycles of tandem RLT, 11 patients (48%) achieved a PR. The treatment was generally tolerated well. Grade 3 events included renal impairment in two (9%) and grade 3 anemia in five (22%) patients, while no Grade 4/5 events occurred. Patients with increased PSMA expression on pretherapeutic PET (defined by the average mean standardized uptake value of all tumor lesions [SUV]) had a higher response rate (86%; 6 out of 7) compared to those with decreased SUV (31%; 5 out of 16). In Cox regression analysis, SUV was significantly associated with PR with a hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = 0.042). PSMA-tumor volume (P = 0.036) and total lesion-PSMA (P = 0.041) were also significant predictors, whereas none of the clinical parameters showed predictive value. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirmed SUV as the strongest PR (P = 0.003).
[CONCLUSION] [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT may offer a safe, effective treatment option. Assessment of PSMA expression on pretherapeutic PET predicts response, supporting its use in guiding personalized treatment.
[METHODS] This retrospective, single-center study included 23 patients with mCRPC who underwent Fluor-18 ([F]F)-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and subsequent tandem RLT. Whole-body tumor segmentation on PET/CT and standard laboratory values were acquired before treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was partial response (PR), defined as either a decline in prostate specific antigen of ≥ 50% (according to prostate cancer clinical trial working group) or PET-based response according to Response Evaluation Criteria on PSMA PET/CT. Safety assessment included renal and hematological side effects following common terminology criteria of adverse events version 5.
[RESULTS] Following two cycles of tandem RLT, 11 patients (48%) achieved a PR. The treatment was generally tolerated well. Grade 3 events included renal impairment in two (9%) and grade 3 anemia in five (22%) patients, while no Grade 4/5 events occurred. Patients with increased PSMA expression on pretherapeutic PET (defined by the average mean standardized uptake value of all tumor lesions [SUV]) had a higher response rate (86%; 6 out of 7) compared to those with decreased SUV (31%; 5 out of 16). In Cox regression analysis, SUV was significantly associated with PR with a hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = 0.042). PSMA-tumor volume (P = 0.036) and total lesion-PSMA (P = 0.041) were also significant predictors, whereas none of the clinical parameters showed predictive value. Kaplan-Meier analysis further confirmed SUV as the strongest PR (P = 0.003).
[CONCLUSION] [Lu]Lu/[Ac]Ac-PSMA tandem RLT may offer a safe, effective treatment option. Assessment of PSMA expression on pretherapeutic PET predicts response, supporting its use in guiding personalized treatment.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Aged; Lutetium; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Neoplasm Metastasis; Actinium; Radioisotopes; Aged, 80 and over; Treatment Outcome; Radiopharmaceuticals