Are Urologists and/or Radiation Oncologists Biased when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery versus Radiation in Consultations for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer?
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
ed when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
Radiation in Consultations for Early
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
11%). [CONCLUSIONS] While specialists acknowledge obvious limitations of their treatments, they selectively highlight advantages of their procedures and the disadvantages of competing treatments.
ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 44.0%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도
[BACKGROUND] Treatment choice for early-stage prostate cancer (PC) is strongly influenced by the counseling physician's specialty.
APA
Friedrich NA, Luu M, et al. (2026). Are Urologists and/or Radiation Oncologists Biased when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery versus Radiation in Consultations for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer?. Clinical genitourinary cancer, 24(2), 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102486
MLA
Friedrich NA, et al.. "Are Urologists and/or Radiation Oncologists Biased when Reporting of Advantages and Disadvantages of Surgery versus Radiation in Consultations for Early-Stage Prostate Cancer?." Clinical genitourinary cancer, vol. 24, no. 2, 2026, pp. 102486.
PMID
41576789 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Treatment choice for early-stage prostate cancer (PC) is strongly influenced by the counseling physician's specialty. Whether a physician's specialty biases how treatment advantages and disadvantages are presented in consultations is unclear. To investigate this, we analyzed content discussed by urologists and radiation oncologists when comparing radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in PC consultations.
[METHODS] Consultations of 39 men with nonmetastatic PC across 6 urologists and radiation oncologists were recorded and transcribed. Analysts thematically characterized statements comparing advantages and disadvantages of surgery versus radiation (and vice versa) using an open coding approach. Frequency of thematic content by specialty was reported at a consultation level. Themes exceeding 10% and differing by ≥ 25% between specialties were reported.
[RESULTS] Our dataset included 1171 statements from 28 Urology and 11 Radiation Oncology consults. Major themes discussed included side effects (90%), cancer control (84%), convenience (56%), salvage options (48%) and invasiveness (43%). Differences in content between specialties were observed for all themes except convenience. For side effects, radiation oncologists (vs. urologists) more often noted that radiation has better urinary (55% vs. 0%) and erectile side effects than surgery (37% vs. 0%). For salvage therapy, urologists more often mentioned inability to get radiation twice (32% vs. 0%) and difficulties with salvage prostatectomy (36% vs. 0%). For cancer control, urologists more often noted long-term data on surgery outcomes as an advantage of surgery (25% vs. 0%). For invasiveness, radiation oncologists more often described radiation as less invasive (36% vs. 11%).
[CONCLUSIONS] While specialists acknowledge obvious limitations of their treatments, they selectively highlight advantages of their procedures and the disadvantages of competing treatments.
[METHODS] Consultations of 39 men with nonmetastatic PC across 6 urologists and radiation oncologists were recorded and transcribed. Analysts thematically characterized statements comparing advantages and disadvantages of surgery versus radiation (and vice versa) using an open coding approach. Frequency of thematic content by specialty was reported at a consultation level. Themes exceeding 10% and differing by ≥ 25% between specialties were reported.
[RESULTS] Our dataset included 1171 statements from 28 Urology and 11 Radiation Oncology consults. Major themes discussed included side effects (90%), cancer control (84%), convenience (56%), salvage options (48%) and invasiveness (43%). Differences in content between specialties were observed for all themes except convenience. For side effects, radiation oncologists (vs. urologists) more often noted that radiation has better urinary (55% vs. 0%) and erectile side effects than surgery (37% vs. 0%). For salvage therapy, urologists more often mentioned inability to get radiation twice (32% vs. 0%) and difficulties with salvage prostatectomy (36% vs. 0%). For cancer control, urologists more often noted long-term data on surgery outcomes as an advantage of surgery (25% vs. 0%). For invasiveness, radiation oncologists more often described radiation as less invasive (36% vs. 11%).
[CONCLUSIONS] While specialists acknowledge obvious limitations of their treatments, they selectively highlight advantages of their procedures and the disadvantages of competing treatments.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)
- Assessing racial differences in time to subsequent treatment following androgen deprivation therapy among Veterans with prostate cancer.
- Racial Differences in Adverse Events After Androgen Deprivation in Veterans With Prostate Cancer.
- Topic Mapping to Inform Content to Discuss in Shared Decision-Making for Prostate Cancer.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.