Motivations and experiences of high-risk men in risk-adapted prostate cancer early detection: A qualitative study.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: a family history were primarily motivated by (1) and (3), men with PGVs by (5) and (6), with (6) and (7) unique to this group
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION] DRKS.de, DRKS00032350. Prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 14 September, 2023 SELECTED HEADING: Patient and User Perspectives and Characteristics.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Cancer survivorship and care
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
[OBJECTIVE] Men with a family history of prostate cancer (PCa) or a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) face increased PCa risk.
APA
Maike K. Klett, Ilayda Balkan, et al. (2026). Motivations and experiences of high-risk men in risk-adapted prostate cancer early detection: A qualitative study.. Patient education and counseling, 149, 109593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2026.109593
MLA
Maike K. Klett, et al.. "Motivations and experiences of high-risk men in risk-adapted prostate cancer early detection: A qualitative study.." Patient education and counseling, vol. 149, 2026, pp. 109593.
PMID
41932171 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] Men with a family history of prostate cancer (PCa) or a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) face increased PCa risk. However, structured PCa early detection and insights into the experiences of affected men remain limited. This qualitative analysis explored (i) why men with familial or genetic PCa risk attended a risk-adapted prevention clinic, (ii) which elements they found helpful, and (iii) how early detection services could be tailored to their needs.
[METHODS] This study was part of the psychosocial mixed-methods study ProFam-Psych, run alongside the ProFam-Risk prevention clinic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a subgroup (13/86 study participants). The clinic offered PSA testing, mpMRI, genetic counselling and panel testing followed by risk-adapted recommendations. Participants were men without PCa who had a family history or previously detected PGV, and men with PCa who had a family history. Participants were selected using maximum variation sampling. Data were analysed by two researchers using Kuckartz's qualitative content analysis.
[RESULTS] Seven motivators were identified: (1) clarify risk/PGV status, (2) information needs, (3) benefits for the family, (4) support others, (5) external recommendation, (6) access to structured screening, and (7) preventive recommendations. Participants with a family history were primarily motivated by (1) and (3), men with PGVs by (5) and (6), with (6) and (7) unique to this group. Perceptions of elements most helpful to participants varied, but the integrated setting with time for questions, clear guidance, and a reliable point of contact was valued. Suggested improvements were mostly organisational, including reminder systems to support long-term adherence.
[CONCLUSION] Interdisciplinary early detection for PCa was accepted by participants, with motivators such as screening access and information needs highlighting the need for the implementation of structured screening programs for high-risk men.
[PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS] Results may inform future outreach efforts and design of screening strategies for familial and genetic PCa risk.
[TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION] DRKS.de, DRKS00032350. Prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 14 September, 2023 SELECTED HEADING: Patient and User Perspectives and Characteristics.
[METHODS] This study was part of the psychosocial mixed-methods study ProFam-Psych, run alongside the ProFam-Risk prevention clinic. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a subgroup (13/86 study participants). The clinic offered PSA testing, mpMRI, genetic counselling and panel testing followed by risk-adapted recommendations. Participants were men without PCa who had a family history or previously detected PGV, and men with PCa who had a family history. Participants were selected using maximum variation sampling. Data were analysed by two researchers using Kuckartz's qualitative content analysis.
[RESULTS] Seven motivators were identified: (1) clarify risk/PGV status, (2) information needs, (3) benefits for the family, (4) support others, (5) external recommendation, (6) access to structured screening, and (7) preventive recommendations. Participants with a family history were primarily motivated by (1) and (3), men with PGVs by (5) and (6), with (6) and (7) unique to this group. Perceptions of elements most helpful to participants varied, but the integrated setting with time for questions, clear guidance, and a reliable point of contact was valued. Suggested improvements were mostly organisational, including reminder systems to support long-term adherence.
[CONCLUSION] Interdisciplinary early detection for PCa was accepted by participants, with motivators such as screening access and information needs highlighting the need for the implementation of structured screening programs for high-risk men.
[PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS] Results may inform future outreach efforts and design of screening strategies for familial and genetic PCa risk.
[TRIAL AND PROTOCOL REGISTRATION] DRKS.de, DRKS00032350. Prospectively registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) on 14 September, 2023 SELECTED HEADING: Patient and User Perspectives and Characteristics.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Reforming the delivery of smoking cessation: a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis of providing smoking cessation as part of targeted lung cancer screening.
- Lung Cancer Screening in Adults: State-of-the-Art and Policy Mapping (2025).
- System-Wide Implementation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Value-Based Care Setting.
- The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others misunderstand stool testing for colorectal cancer.
- Does Messaging for Reducing Breast Cancer Overscreening in Older Women Have Differential Responses among Medical Minimizers and Maximizers?