본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Omitting Elective Pelvic Nodes Irradiation in High Risk Prostate Cancer: Report on 43 Consecutive Elderly Patients.

1/5 보강
Journal of personalized medicine 📖 저널 OA 95% 2026 Vol.16(4)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
4 patients (9.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our findings suggest that PORT, when combined with long-term ADT and modern staging, provides excellent disease control and a favorable safety profile in elderly HR PC patients.

Chioccola E, Caroprese M, Goodyear CA, Barillaro A, Valerio G, Oliviero C, Buono M, Clemente S, Farella A, Conson M, Pacelli R

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

: Radiotherapy (RT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 추적기간 60 months

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Chioccola E, Caroprese M, et al. (2026). Omitting Elective Pelvic Nodes Irradiation in High Risk Prostate Cancer: Report on 43 Consecutive Elderly Patients.. Journal of personalized medicine, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm16040177
MLA Chioccola E, et al.. "Omitting Elective Pelvic Nodes Irradiation in High Risk Prostate Cancer: Report on 43 Consecutive Elderly Patients.." Journal of personalized medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, 2026.
PMID 42042544
DOI 10.3390/jpm16040177

Abstract

: Radiotherapy (RT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a standard treatment for non-metastatic high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PC). However, the benefit of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients, although suggested, remains controversial, particularly in the elderly. We report the outcomes of elderly HR PC patients treated with prostate-only RT (PORT) and ADT in a "real-word" setting. : Between 2016 and 2022, 43 consecutive elderly patients (median age 76 years) with HR- or very HR-PC according to NCCN criteria version 1.2026 (cN0, cT3-cT4 and/or ISUP Grade Group 4-5 and/or PSA serum levels at diagnosis ≥ 20 ng/mL) were treated at our institution. All patients were staged with abdominal MRI or CT and bone scan; nineteen patients (44.2%) also underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT. All patients received PORT (predominantly moderate hypofractionation, 67.5-70 Gy in 25-28 fractions) and ADT (median duration 24 months). To ensure consistency, all oncological endpoints-Biochemical Failure-Free Survival (BFFS; Phoenix criteria), Disease-Free Survival (DFS), Metastasis-Free Survival (MFS), Prostate Cancer-Specific Survival (PCSS), and Overall Survival (OS)-were calculated from a unified time-zero (initiation of first oncological treatment). DFS was defined as a composite endpoint including biochemical failure, radiological recurrence, or initiation of salvage therapy. : at a median follow-up of 60 months, no patient reached the Phoenix threshold, resulting in a 100% 5- and 7-year BFFS. However, 4 patients (9.3%) experienced radiological recurrence detected via PET/CT before reaching the nadir + 2 threshold, yielding an estimated 5-year and 7-year DFS of 94.7% and 71.8%, respectively. The 5- and 7-year MFS was of 97.6% and 88.7%, respectively. Seven deaths occurred, all non-PC related, resulting in a 5-year OS of 86.7% and a Prostate Cancer-Specific Survival of 100%. Gastrointestinal toxicity was notably low (no acute or late G3-G4 events). : Our findings suggest that PORT, when combined with long-term ADT and modern staging, provides excellent disease control and a favorable safety profile in elderly HR PC patients. Given the high rate of competing mortality in this population, treatment de-escalation via PORT appears to be a clinically reasonable strategy. These results are hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in prospective randomized trials.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH