본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Individualized Precision Prostate Biopsy Strategy for Patients With PI-RADS Score 2: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

The Prostate 2026 Vol.86(5) p. 534-541

Xu Z, Liang Y, Zhang Z, Huang M, Cheng C, Ma Y, Xia D, Liu S, Tao T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Prostate biopsy is currently the most common method of diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa).

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Xu Z, Liang Y, et al. (2026). Individualized Precision Prostate Biopsy Strategy for Patients With PI-RADS Score 2: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.. The Prostate, 86(5), 534-541. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70116
MLA Xu Z, et al.. "Individualized Precision Prostate Biopsy Strategy for Patients With PI-RADS Score 2: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.." The Prostate, vol. 86, no. 5, 2026, pp. 534-541.
PMID 41410022
DOI 10.1002/pros.70116

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Prostate biopsy is currently the most common method of diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). However, excessive biopsies not only cause physical and psychological pain to patients, but also increase the healthcare burden. We aimed to provide a biopsy strategy for patients with PI-RADS score 2 to improve the detection rate of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) while minimizing unnecessary prostate biopsies.

[METHODS] This study retrospectively collected clinical data from patients undergoing prostate biopsy from three medical centers in China. The KD cohort was used as the primary analysis cohort, and the ZD and YJS cohorts were used as external validation cohorts. Diagnostic capacity of clinical variables was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) and compared with DeLong test. By plotting the relationship between csPCa risk and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) values using a locally estimated scatterplot smoothing(loess) function, the PSAD cutoff value corresponding to a clinically reasonable csPCa risk is determined. Prostate biopsy strategies are represented as simple decision tree diagrams. This study used csPCa as the only study endpoint.

[RESULTS] By grouping patients with a cut-off value of PSAD ≥ 0.46 ng/ml, the detection rate of csPCa in the KD cohort of patients with a PI-RADS score of 2 increased from an initial 3.7-18.7%. And according to our proposed strategy would reduce unnecessary prostate biopsy by 86.5%, and at the same time could reduce the detection of clinically insignificant PCa (cisPCa) by 96.7%, at the cost of missing 1.3% of csPCa. The similar diagnostic performance was also shown in the ZD and YJS cohorts.

[CONCLUSIONS] The individualized precision prostate biopsy strategy is developed in this study, which can be used to make optimal decisions when faced with low-risk PCa (PI-RADS score 2) patients.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)