본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Patient awareness and perspectives regarding the value of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study.

단면연구 1/5 보강
Urologic oncology 2026 Vol.44(4) p. 110993
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
158 patients were enrolled; only 41.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Educated and higher-income patients had comparatively better knowledge about FT and also leaned towards functional outcomes. As FT demand continues to expand, addressing knowledge gaps is crucial to ensure informed and equitable healthcare delivery.

Yasinzai AK, Smith J, Lertkitcharoenpo A, Bourricaudy RA, Chang JJ, Stringer TF, DiBianco JM, Joseph JP, O'Malley P, Crispen PL, Su LM, Benidir T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] With the expanding therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer (PCa), little is known regarding patient values and perspectives that influence the selection process for focal therap

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < 0.01
  • p-value P = 0.010
  • 연구 설계 cross-sectional

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Yasinzai AK, Smith J, et al. (2026). Patient awareness and perspectives regarding the value of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study.. Urologic oncology, 44(4), 110993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2026.110993
MLA Yasinzai AK, et al.. "Patient awareness and perspectives regarding the value of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study.." Urologic oncology, vol. 44, no. 4, 2026, pp. 110993.
PMID 41655341

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] With the expanding therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer (PCa), little is known regarding patient values and perspectives that influence the selection process for focal therapy (FT) vs. conventional treatments. This study explores the socioeconomic and demographic factors that influence patients' decisions for FT.

[METHODS] This was a single-center cross-sectional study using a patient-centered survey of men with concerns about or a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer who were potential candidates for focal therapy. Information on patient demographics and clinical status was collected along with hypothetical scenarios to study the preferences of patients. Descriptives and univariate tests of associations were utilized for analysis.

[RESULTS] In total, 158 patients were enrolled; only 41.1% of patients had prior knowledge of FT. Among those with a diagnosis of PCa and endorsing prior FT knowledge, 44.3% did not understand its efficacy, while 27.9% did not know if FT has any potential side effects. Education and income significantly influenced FT knowledge. Specifically, 52.4% of patients with advanced education were familiar with FT compared to 20% of those with only a high school education (P < 0.01). Patients with income of >$75,000 were more likely to be aware of FT (60.7%, P = 0.010). Interestingly, neither disease stability nor treatment status influenced therapy preferences. Sexually active patients were more likely to be aware of FT as an option.

[CONCLUSIONS] A considerable proportion of PCa patients, specifically those in lower socioeconomic groups, remain unaware of FT's existence and its potential role in well-selected PCa management. Educated and higher-income patients had comparatively better knowledge about FT and also leaned towards functional outcomes. As FT demand continues to expand, addressing knowledge gaps is crucial to ensure informed and equitable healthcare delivery.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Male; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prostatic Neoplasms; Aged; Middle Aged; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Surveys and Questionnaires; Aged, 80 and over; Socioeconomic Factors