본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Training With Local Data Remains Important for Deep Learning MRI Prostate Cancer Detection.

3/5 보강
Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes 📖 저널 OA 20% 2024: 0/4 OA 2025: 0/3 OA 2026: 5/17 OA 2024~2026 2026 Vol.77(2) p. 338-347 cited 1 OA Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatm
TL;DR Domain shift limits MRI prostate cancer segmentation performance even when training with over 1000 exams from 3 external institutions, suggesting use of local data is paramount at these scales.
Retraction 확인
출처
PubMed DOI OpenAlex Semantic 마지막 보강 2026-04-29
OpenAlex 토픽 · Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Carere SG, Jewell J, Nasute Fauerbach PV, Emerson DB, Finelli A, Ghai S, Haider MA

📖 무료 전문 🔓 OA PDF oa
📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Domain shift limits MRI prostate cancer segmentation performance even when training with over 1000 exams from 3 external institutions, suggesting use of local data is paramount at these scales.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Shawn G. Carere, John G. Jewell, et al. (2026). Training With Local Data Remains Important for Deep Learning MRI Prostate Cancer Detection.. Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes, 77(2), 338-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251367620
MLA Shawn G. Carere, et al.. "Training With Local Data Remains Important for Deep Learning MRI Prostate Cancer Detection.." Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes, vol. 77, no. 2, 2026, pp. 338-347.
PMID 40936310 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] Domain shift has been shown to have a major detrimental effect on AI model performance however prior studies on domain shift for MRI prostate cancer segmentation have been limited to small, or heterogenous cohorts. Our objective was to assess whether prostate cancer segmentation models trained on local MRI data continue to outperform those trained on external data with cohorts exceeding 1000.

[METHODS] We simulated a multi-institutional consortium using the public PICAI dataset (PICAI-TRAIN: , PICAI-TEST: ) and a local dataset (LOCAL-TRAIN: , LOCAL-TEST: ). IRB approval was obtained and consent waived. We compared nnUNet-v2 models trained on the combined data (CENTRAL-TRAIN) and separately on PICAI-TRAIN and LOCAL-TRAIN. Accuracy was evaluated using the open source PICAI Score on LOCAL-TEST. Significance was tested using bootstrapping.

[RESULTS] Just 22% (309/1400) of LOCAL-TRAIN exams would be sufficient to match the performance of a model trained on PICAI-TRAIN. The CENTRAL-TRAIN performance was similar to LOCAL-TRAIN performance, with PICAI Scores [95% CI] of 65 [58-71] and 66 [60-72], respectively. Both of these models exceeded the model trained on PICAI-TRAIN alone which had a score of 58 [51-64] ( < .002). Reducing training set size did not alter these relative trends.

[CONCLUSION] Domain shift limits MRI prostate cancer segmentation performance even when training with over 1000 exams from 3 external institutions. Use of local data is paramount at these scales.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🔓 OA PDF 열기