The PRAGMATIC pathway - PRostate cancer diAGnosis and MAnagement Triage In Clinical care.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Frailty in Older Adults
[OBJECTIVES] To investigate whether nurse navigator-led triaging of high-risk patients may reduce prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment times using an in-house bespoke PRostate cancer diAGnosi
- p-value P < 0.001
- p-value P < 0.05
APA
Abhishek Sharma, Teresa Campbell, et al. (2026). The PRAGMATIC pathway - PRostate cancer diAGnosis and MAnagement Triage In Clinical care.. BJU international, 137(5), 849-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.70191
MLA
Abhishek Sharma, et al.. "The PRAGMATIC pathway - PRostate cancer diAGnosis and MAnagement Triage In Clinical care.." BJU international, vol. 137, no. 5, 2026, pp. 849-857.
PMID
41744174
Abstract
[OBJECTIVES] To investigate whether nurse navigator-led triaging of high-risk patients may reduce prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment times using an in-house bespoke PRostate cancer diAGnosis and MAnagement Triage In the Clinial care pathway (PRAGMATIC) triaging system, as locally advanced/metastatic disease should be diagnosed and treated rapidly, and UK targets allow 28 days for diagnosis, and 62 days to commence treatment.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We reviewed diagnosis and treatment timelines for patients undergoing 28/62-day investigation for suspected PCa at a tertiary unit in a 3-month period (2022). We then introduced nurse navigator-led triaging of urgent referrals and evaluated a subsequent 3-month period (2024), with streamlining for rapid investigation and treatment based on prostate-specific antigen, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging, and histology. We hypothesised nurse navigator-led triaging would improve investigation and treatment times for high-risk localised, or locally advanced, or metastatic PCa.
[RESULTS] A total of 165 and 327 consecutive patients were on the 28/62-day PCa pathway in the pre- (2022) and post-nurse navigator-led (2024) triaging periods, respectively. The median time from referral to first appointment (8 vs 4 days), MRI (12 vs 6 days), MRI result (26 vs 17 days), biopsy decision (25 vs 16 days), biopsy procedure (48 vs 22 days), biopsy result communication (64 vs 44 fays), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography staging scan (87 vs 56 days) was reduced following nurse navigator triaging of high-risk cases (all P < 0.001). The median time from referral to treatment for Gleason Grade Group ≥3, or T3, or ≥N1, or ≥M1 disease (104 vs 70 days; 49/75 [65.3%] vs 72/128 [56.3%] patients), and for M1b disease (47 vs 27 days; 15/75 [20%] vs 32/128 [25%] patients), was reduced (P < 0.05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Nurse navigator-led triaging and stratification of the most clinically urgent suspected PCa cases was associated with improved imaging, biopsy diagnosis, and treatment times for the highest-risk patients.
[PATIENTS AND METHODS] We reviewed diagnosis and treatment timelines for patients undergoing 28/62-day investigation for suspected PCa at a tertiary unit in a 3-month period (2022). We then introduced nurse navigator-led triaging of urgent referrals and evaluated a subsequent 3-month period (2024), with streamlining for rapid investigation and treatment based on prostate-specific antigen, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging, and histology. We hypothesised nurse navigator-led triaging would improve investigation and treatment times for high-risk localised, or locally advanced, or metastatic PCa.
[RESULTS] A total of 165 and 327 consecutive patients were on the 28/62-day PCa pathway in the pre- (2022) and post-nurse navigator-led (2024) triaging periods, respectively. The median time from referral to first appointment (8 vs 4 days), MRI (12 vs 6 days), MRI result (26 vs 17 days), biopsy decision (25 vs 16 days), biopsy procedure (48 vs 22 days), biopsy result communication (64 vs 44 fays), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography staging scan (87 vs 56 days) was reduced following nurse navigator triaging of high-risk cases (all P < 0.001). The median time from referral to treatment for Gleason Grade Group ≥3, or T3, or ≥N1, or ≥M1 disease (104 vs 70 days; 49/75 [65.3%] vs 72/128 [56.3%] patients), and for M1b disease (47 vs 27 days; 15/75 [20%] vs 32/128 [25%] patients), was reduced (P < 0.05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Nurse navigator-led triaging and stratification of the most clinically urgent suspected PCa cases was associated with improved imaging, biopsy diagnosis, and treatment times for the highest-risk patients.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Triage; Aged; Middle Aged; Critical Pathways; Time-to-Treatment; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Referral and Consultation; Neoplasm Staging; Prostate-Specific Antigen
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Intracranial metastases from solid tumors: Call to action and consensus from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology collaborative.
- SLC7A11 as a molecular nexus of prognosis, resistance, and therapeutic roadmap in cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Smart Biomaterials as Immunomodulators in Cancer Therapy.
- Smoking Behavior Is Associated With an Altered Immune Landscape in Prostate Cancer: Implications for Patient Outcomes.
- Impact of Graded Physical Exercise on Aerobic fitness, Endurance and health related functional outcomes among cancer patients: A Systematic Review.