Role of Local Treatment to the Prostate in Patients With de Novo Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
454 patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC, LT was administered in addition to ARPI in 18%.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
additional LT, although the association did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 0
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] The current study suggests that adding LT to ARPIs in patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC may be associated with improved ToT and OS. The addition of LT to ARPI as the backbone of therapy may be considered in patients presenting with de novo low-volume mHSPC.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Local treatment (LT) to the prostate demonstrated better cancer-control outcomes in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy for patients with low-vol
- 95% CI 0.32-6.58
- HR 0.09
APA
Philipp Mandel, Mike Wenzel, et al. (2026). Role of Local Treatment to the Prostate in Patients With de Novo Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.. European urology open science, 87, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2026.03.010
MLA
Philipp Mandel, et al.. "Role of Local Treatment to the Prostate in Patients With de Novo Low-volume Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors.." European urology open science, vol. 87, 2026, pp. 16-24.
PMID
41970604 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE] Local treatment (LT) to the prostate demonstrated better cancer-control outcomes in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy for patients with low-volume metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the association of LT with outcomes in patients receiving ADT plus androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) across different mHSPC subtypes is under debate.
[METHODS] Relying on the multicentric international ARON-3 database, patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC undergoing ARPI treatment were selected. Stratification was made according to LT vs. no LT with the primary endpoint of time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS).
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Of 454 patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC, LT was administered in addition to ARPI in 18%. In the 6-mo landmark cohort, ToT was longer in patients who received additional LT, although the association did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-1.10, = 0.088). The restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 36 mo reported a difference of 2.76 mo (95% CI: 0.32-6.58, = 0.031) in the LT group compared with the no-LT group. OS was significantly longer in patients receiving ARPI and LT compared with ARPI alone (HR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.64, = 0.016). The RMST at 36 mo reported a difference of 4.67 mo (95% CI: 3.18-6.17, < 0.001) in favor of the LT group. In the ridge regression, LT remained the only statistically significant predictor of ToT and OS.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] The current study suggests that adding LT to ARPIs in patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC may be associated with improved ToT and OS. The addition of LT to ARPI as the backbone of therapy may be considered in patients presenting with de novo low-volume mHSPC.
[METHODS] Relying on the multicentric international ARON-3 database, patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC undergoing ARPI treatment were selected. Stratification was made according to LT vs. no LT with the primary endpoint of time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS).
[KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS] Of 454 patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC, LT was administered in addition to ARPI in 18%. In the 6-mo landmark cohort, ToT was longer in patients who received additional LT, although the association did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-1.10, = 0.088). The restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 36 mo reported a difference of 2.76 mo (95% CI: 0.32-6.58, = 0.031) in the LT group compared with the no-LT group. OS was significantly longer in patients receiving ARPI and LT compared with ARPI alone (HR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.64, = 0.016). The RMST at 36 mo reported a difference of 4.67 mo (95% CI: 3.18-6.17, < 0.001) in favor of the LT group. In the ridge regression, LT remained the only statistically significant predictor of ToT and OS.
[CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS] The current study suggests that adding LT to ARPIs in patients with de novo low-volume mHSPC may be associated with improved ToT and OS. The addition of LT to ARPI as the backbone of therapy may be considered in patients presenting with de novo low-volume mHSPC.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Steroidogenesis inhibitor opevesostat (MK-5684) for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: OMAHA-003 and OMAHA-004 trial designs.
- PARP Inhibition in Prostate Cancer: Current Status, Resistance Mechanisms, and Clinical Challenges.
- Validation of the MTXPK Tool in Predicting Glucarpidase Utilization Among Patients With Delayed Methotrexate Clearance: A Retrospective Study.
- Insights from PSMAfore: impact on health-related quality of life.
- Effective high-dose methotrexate toxicity reversal using fixed-dose glucarpidase in obese patients: a case series.
- Does PARP1 up-regulation correlate with PSMA expression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer studied with [F]PARPi and [Ga]PSMA PET/CT?