Impact of Intraprostatic Simultaneous Integrated Boost on Long-Term Outcomes in Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy and Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy.
2/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
194 patients with UIR-PCa treated at three institutions between 2010 and 2023.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
image-guided intensity-modulated or volumetric modulated arc RT to 78 Gy with short-term ADT
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The addition of an intraprostatic SIB was safe but did not confer measurable improvement in biochemical or distant disease control. These findings support a selective rather than routine use of focal intraprostatic dose escalation in contemporary UIR-PCa management.
OpenAlex 토픽 ·
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
[BACKGROUND] Unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (UIR-PCa) represents a biologically heterogeneous subgroup with a higher risk of recurrence compared with favorable intermediate-risk disease
- 추적기간 105 months
APA
Cem Onal, Aysenur Elmali, et al. (2026). Impact of Intraprostatic Simultaneous Integrated Boost on Long-Term Outcomes in Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy and Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy.. The Prostate, 86(8), 961-969. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70167
MLA
Cem Onal, et al.. "Impact of Intraprostatic Simultaneous Integrated Boost on Long-Term Outcomes in Unfavorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy and Short-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy.." The Prostate, vol. 86, no. 8, 2026, pp. 961-969.
PMID
41911486 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (UIR-PCa) represents a biologically heterogeneous subgroup with a higher risk of recurrence compared with favorable intermediate-risk disease. Contemporary management frequently includes dose-escalated radiotherapy (RT) combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether additional intraprostatic dose escalation using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) provides incremental oncologic benefit in this setting remains uncertain.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with UIR-PCa treated at three institutions between 2010 and 2023. All patients received image-guided intensity-modulated or volumetric modulated arc RT to 78 Gy with short-term ADT. An MRI-guided intraprostatic SIB (up to 86 Gy) was delivered in 77 patients (39.7%) at clinician discretion. Primary endpoints were biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Multivariable Cox and competing-risk regression models were used to assess predictors of outcome.
[RESULTS] After a median follow-up of 105 months, 8-year bRFS and DMFS rates for the entire cohort were 93.7% and 95.7%, respectively. Addition of SIB was not associated with improved bRFS (93.5% vs 93.6%, p = 0.36), DMFS (94.6% vs 96.7%, p = 0.15), or PCSM. Percent positive biopsy cores ≥ 50% was the only independent predictor of inferior bRFS on multivariable analysis. Treatment-related toxicity was low in both groups, with no significant differences in late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.
[CONCLUSIONS] In patients with UIR-PCa uniformly treated with dose-escalated, image-guided RT and short-term ADT, long-term oncologic outcomes were excellent. The addition of an intraprostatic SIB was safe but did not confer measurable improvement in biochemical or distant disease control. These findings support a selective rather than routine use of focal intraprostatic dose escalation in contemporary UIR-PCa management.
[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 194 patients with UIR-PCa treated at three institutions between 2010 and 2023. All patients received image-guided intensity-modulated or volumetric modulated arc RT to 78 Gy with short-term ADT. An MRI-guided intraprostatic SIB (up to 86 Gy) was delivered in 77 patients (39.7%) at clinician discretion. Primary endpoints were biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). Multivariable Cox and competing-risk regression models were used to assess predictors of outcome.
[RESULTS] After a median follow-up of 105 months, 8-year bRFS and DMFS rates for the entire cohort were 93.7% and 95.7%, respectively. Addition of SIB was not associated with improved bRFS (93.5% vs 93.6%, p = 0.36), DMFS (94.6% vs 96.7%, p = 0.15), or PCSM. Percent positive biopsy cores ≥ 50% was the only independent predictor of inferior bRFS on multivariable analysis. Treatment-related toxicity was low in both groups, with no significant differences in late grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity.
[CONCLUSIONS] In patients with UIR-PCa uniformly treated with dose-escalated, image-guided RT and short-term ADT, long-term oncologic outcomes were excellent. The addition of an intraprostatic SIB was safe but did not confer measurable improvement in biochemical or distant disease control. These findings support a selective rather than routine use of focal intraprostatic dose escalation in contemporary UIR-PCa management.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Beyond tunnel vision - reconsidering real-world evidence on staging in intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
- SBRT Boost in Prostate Cancer: Progress Made, Questions Remain.
- Propensity Score Matched Analysis of External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Lesions in Prostate Cancer.
- Predictive utility of Post-Treatment tumor apparent diffusion coefficient in High-Risk prostate cancer undergoing definitive Radiotherapy: A Long-Term outcome analysis.
- Definitive radiotherapy in older patients with high-risk prostate cancer: Age should not be a barrier.