본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.

1/5 보강
BMJ open 📖 저널 OA 98.9% 2021: 4/4 OA 2022: 7/7 OA 2023: 5/5 OA 2024: 16/16 OA 2025: 73/73 OA 2026: 55/57 OA 2021~2026 2024 Vol.14(11) p. e080846
Retraction 확인
출처

Ying T, Xia R, Zhang Y, Dai J, Wang Y, Xie X

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healt

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ying T, Xia R, et al. (2024). Cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.. BMJ open, 14(11), e080846. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080846
MLA Ying T, et al.. "Cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.." BMJ open, vol. 14, no. 11, 2024, pp. e080846.
PMID 39510786 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

[DESIGNS] Based on the overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) data from the Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS) trial (NCT02500043), a three-state Markov model (PFS, progressed disease and death) was constructed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of FTD/TPI compared with the placebo in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. Cost and utility were from pricing records and the literature. The model was simulated for 5 years with monthly cycles. Costs and health outcomes were discounted by 5%. We then conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the parameters. The model results were from the Chinese healthcare system.

[OUTCOME MEASURES] The output results were the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

[RESULTS] According to the model results, FTD/TPI generated an additional cost of US$26 855.66 and 0.88 QALYs compared with the placebo. ICER of FTD/TPI compared with the placebo was US$30 494.89 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the utility value of the PFS stage and FTD/TPI adverse event costs were the main influencing parameters, and the results were stable. At a threshold of three times per capita gross domestic product of China (US$35 559.34 in 2022), the probability of FTD/TPI being cost-effective compared with placebo was 99.2%.

[CONCLUSION] From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, FTD/TPI is a more cost-effective option compared with the placebo for the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in patients who have received at least two prior advanced treatment regimens.

[TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER] The Chinese population registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400080940) and clinical trial (NCT05029102).

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기