Prevalence of Abnormalities at Tandem Endoscopy in Patients Referred for Colorectal Cancer Screening/Surveillance Colonoscopy.

Performing a tandem endoscopy and colonoscopy in selected individuals has advantages, such as the early detection of benign and/or precancerous foregut diseases; it is efficient, and it may allow added therapies. It may also have disadvantages, such as generating anxiety from false-positive screening, possible harm from further testing, and unproven cost-effectiveness. We aimed to examine the prevalence of foregut endoscopic and histologic abnormalities in subjects referred for screening/surveillance colonoscopy who also underwent a tandem endoscopy. We wanted to (1) assess implications for cancer detection, intervention, and surveillance of precancerous foregut abnormalities, (2) identify benign foregut lesions, and (3) generate data on the utilities of this tandem approach. A retrospective cohort study of consecutive subjects referred for screening or surveillance colonoscopy who also underwent an endoscopy. Based on national screening guidelines, responses to prompting questions, personal or family history, or other risk factors, subjects were assigned to tandem endoscopy with biopsies (modified Seattle and Sydney protocols), under one anesthesia. Of the 1004 patients referred for colonoscopy, 317 (32%) underwent tandem endoscopy. There were 214 women and 103 men. There were 237 Whites, 16 Asians, 40 Blacks, and 24 Hispanics. Median age was 59 (range 19-85). At endoscopy, we identified actionable benign (45%) peptic, inflammatory, and -related abnormalities, and premalignant findings (i.e., intestinal metaplasia, 27%, dysplasia, 2%, and cancer 0.9%), comparable to the premalignant (40.3%) and malignant (0.6%) colonoscopy yield. When implemented based on national screening guidelines, tandem EGD and colonoscopy combines Barrett's esophagus and gastric cancer screening in one examination, and it has a high yield in a diverse US population.