본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective real-world study.

1/5 보강
Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 📖 저널 OA 100% 2022: 1/1 OA 2024: 10/10 OA 2025: 39/39 OA 2026: 20/20 OA 2022~2026 2024 Vol.20(1) p. 2423479
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
34 patients, mainly including leukopenia 9 (10.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy showed good survival benefit and acceptable safety in the therapy of AGC. Especially for patients with HER-2-positive and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1%, rechallenge may be an effective treatment modality.

Guo M, Zhao W, Chen Y, Zou D, Peng W, Sha H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

We aimed to explore the efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to analyze the factors affecting prognosis based on clinical characteristics.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.26-1.30
  • HR 0.59

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Guo M, Zhao W, et al. (2024). Efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective real-world study.. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 20(1), 2423479. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2423479
MLA Guo M, et al.. "Efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective real-world study.." Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, vol. 20, no. 1, 2024, pp. 2423479.
PMID 39494935 ↗

Abstract

We aimed to explore the efficacy of rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and to analyze the factors affecting prognosis based on clinical characteristics. Eighty-five AGC patients who underwent rechallenged after the failure of first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were retrospectively collected from July 2019 to December 2022 in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. Potential factors affecting prognosis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method and Log rank test. Stratified factors included human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS). The objective response rate (ORR) was 15.3%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 74.1%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months. Results showed that patients in the I + C group had the best response. The ORR was 20.0% VS 8.7% in the I + C group and I + C + AAD group. The DCR was 78.0% VS 65.2%, and the median PFS was 6.7 VS 4.7 months [hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-1.00,  = .022]. The ORR was 20.0% VS 8.3% in the I + C group and I + C + ADC group. The DCR was 78.0% VS 75.0%, and the median PFS was 6.7 VS 4.4 months (HR: 0.59, 95%CI: 0.26-1.30,  = .112). The median PFS was 4.7 VS 4.4 months in the I + C + AAD group and I + C + ADC group (HR: 1.21, 95%CI: 0.60-2.47,  = .580). Adverse events (AEs) were found in 34 patients, mainly including leukopenia 9 (10.6%), and neutropenia 8 (9.4%). The incidence of grade 3-4 AEs was 8.2%. There were no drug-related deaths and all AEs were manageable. Rechallenge after first-line immunotherapy showed good survival benefit and acceptable safety in the therapy of AGC. Especially for patients with HER-2-positive and PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1%, rechallenge may be an effective treatment modality.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기