The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.
[INTRODUCTION] Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management.
- p-value p = 0.015
APA
Uçar G, Sekmek S, et al. (2025). The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.. Oncology, 103(2), 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1159/000540517
MLA
Uçar G, et al.. "The Comparison of FLOT and DCF Regimens as Perioperative Treatment for Gastric Cancer.." Oncology, vol. 103, no. 2, 2025, pp. 128-133.
PMID
39079501
Abstract
[INTRODUCTION] Locoregional gastric cancer is a still serious problem and perioperative treatments may improve the success of management. Different regimens were examined. The present study purposed to compare the efficacy of fluorouracil-leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT) and docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil (DCF) regimens.
[METHODS] A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared.
[RESULTS] Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015).
[CONCLUSION] FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.
[METHODS] A retrospective multicenter study assessed the patients with locoregional gastric cancer. There are 240 patients (137 DCF, 103 FLOT). Survival rates were compared.
[RESULTS] Demographic features were similar between the two groups, but the time period was different. The FLOT group had 7.8% pathological complete response, while the DCF group did not. Disease-free survival was longer in the FLOT than in the DCF group (median not reached - 13.94 months, respectively). Median overall survival was similar (30.9 vs. 37.8 months), but median follow-up affected the analysis. Survival for 36 months was 63% for the FLOT group and 40% for the DCF group (log-rank; p = 0.015).
[CONCLUSION] FLOT regimen was superior to DCF regimen for response and survival rates. DCF is a historical approach. Long-term follow-up period is needed for FLOT treatment.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Female; Male; Docetaxel; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Fluorouracil; Leucovorin; Aged; Oxaliplatin; Cisplatin; Taxoids; Organoplatinum Compounds; Adult; Disease-Free Survival; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome