Minimally invasive surgery versus open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 4/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
332 patients were included in the study (166 in each group).
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Minimally invasive surgery
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
No significant differences were noted in the 3-y overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival between the groups (all > 0.200). [CONCLUSION] Minimally invasive surgery for older patients with gastric cancer may be more beneficial than open gastrectomy in terms of blood loss and hospital stay.
[AIM] To compare minimally invasive and open surgery for older patients with gastric cancer.
APA
Yamamoto M, Omori T, et al. (2025). Minimally invasive surgery versus open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.. Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 9(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12842
MLA
Yamamoto M, et al.. "Minimally invasive surgery versus open gastrectomy for older patients with gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis.." Annals of gastroenterological surgery, vol. 9, no. 1, 2025, pp. 69-78.
PMID
39759980
Abstract
[AIM] To compare minimally invasive and open surgery for older patients with gastric cancer.
[METHODS] This study included 464 consecutive patients with gastric cancer aged ≥75 years who underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy at our institution from January 2004 to December 2018. We performed propensity score-matching and compared short- and long-term outcomes between the two groups.
[RESULTS] After matching, 332 patients were included in the study (166 in each group). The laparoscopy group had a longer operative time, lesser blood loss, and shorter hospital stays than the open surgery group (all < 0.020). The laparoscopy group had a lower complication rate than the open surgery group ( = 0.002). No significant differences were noted in the 3-y overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival between the groups (all > 0.200).
[CONCLUSION] Minimally invasive surgery for older patients with gastric cancer may be more beneficial than open gastrectomy in terms of blood loss and hospital stay.
[METHODS] This study included 464 consecutive patients with gastric cancer aged ≥75 years who underwent open or laparoscopic gastrectomy at our institution from January 2004 to December 2018. We performed propensity score-matching and compared short- and long-term outcomes between the two groups.
[RESULTS] After matching, 332 patients were included in the study (166 in each group). The laparoscopy group had a longer operative time, lesser blood loss, and shorter hospital stays than the open surgery group (all < 0.020). The laparoscopy group had a lower complication rate than the open surgery group ( = 0.002). No significant differences were noted in the 3-y overall, recurrence-free, and disease-free survival between the groups (all > 0.200).
[CONCLUSION] Minimally invasive surgery for older patients with gastric cancer may be more beneficial than open gastrectomy in terms of blood loss and hospital stay.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (4)
- Anticancer drug-treated fibroblasts modulate colon cancer cell behavior through lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor-mediated signaling.
- Short-Term Efficacy and Long-Term Limitations of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Colorectal Obstruction due to Extracolonic Malignancies.
- Prognostic Value of a Novel Index Combining the Prognostic Nutritional Index and D-Dimer Levels for Gastric Cancer after Gastrectomy.
- Postoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Useful Prognostic Factor in Patients With Gastric Cancer.