본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Cost-Effective Endoscopic Screening Strategies for Asymptomatic Gastric Cancer.

1/5 보강
Digestion 2025 Vol.106(6) p. 616-623
Retraction 확인
출처

Ishibashi F, Okusa K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] In Japan, biennial esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening for gastric cancer (GC) has been implemented for adults aged ≥50 years as part of a population-based screening program.

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ishibashi F, Okusa K (2025). Cost-Effective Endoscopic Screening Strategies for Asymptomatic Gastric Cancer.. Digestion, 106(6), 616-623. https://doi.org/10.1159/000546835
MLA Ishibashi F, et al.. "Cost-Effective Endoscopic Screening Strategies for Asymptomatic Gastric Cancer.." Digestion, vol. 106, no. 6, 2025, pp. 616-623.
PMID 40472817
DOI 10.1159/000546835

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] In Japan, biennial esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening for gastric cancer (GC) has been implemented for adults aged ≥50 years as part of a population-based screening program. This approach has facilitated early GC detection and demonstrated individual-level benefits. However, due to a generational decline in Helicobacter pylori infection, a reduction in the long-term effectiveness of this strategy is anticipated. Given the allocation of national resources, a cost-effectiveness evaluation is essential.

[SUMMARY] As GC prevalence declines in the target population, the cost-effectiveness of existing screening practices may diminish. Mathematical simulation models are commonly employed to assess the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of various cancer screening strategies. Microsimulation models, which track individual-level outcomes, are utilized to evaluate person-level effects. By contrast, macrosimulation models - such as Markov and decision tree models - are used to assess population-level outcomes.

[KEY MESSAGES] Nine studies have compared different EGD screening strategies. These studies support the effectiveness of biennial screening in high-risk countries. In low- to intermediate-risk countries - and among lower risk populations within high-risk countries - extending the screening interval to ≥3 years appears reasonable. Additionally, strategies incorporating risk stratification using alternative modalities, such as serological tests, are more cost-effective. Continued discussion is necessary to optimize the EGD screening approach.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Early Detection of Cancer; Mass Screening; Helicobacter Infections; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Japan; Helicobacter pylori; Middle Aged; Markov Chains; Aged

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)