본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Occupational disparities in common cancer screening participation among workers: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.

단면연구 1/5 보강
Journal of occupational health 2025 Vol.67(1)
Retraction 확인
출처

Watanabe K, Tabuchi T, Zaitsu M

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[OBJECTIVES] Cancer screening is crucial for early detection and improved health outcomes.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 7038
  • 95% CI 1.04-1.22
  • 연구 설계 cross-sectional

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Watanabe K, Tabuchi T, Zaitsu M (2025). Occupational disparities in common cancer screening participation among workers: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.. Journal of occupational health, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiaf046
MLA Watanabe K, et al.. "Occupational disparities in common cancer screening participation among workers: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.." Journal of occupational health, vol. 67, no. 1, 2025.
PMID 40795406 ↗

Abstract

[OBJECTIVES] Cancer screening is crucial for early detection and improved health outcomes. Limited evidence exists on the association between occupational class and cancer screening participation in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to examine screening participation rates and disparities among active workers across different occupational classes.

[METHODS] This cross-sectional study analyzed data from a nationwide web-based survey conducted in Japan (September to November, 2023). Eligible participants included current workers aged 40-64 years for colorectal, lung, and stomach cancer screenings (n = 7038); workers aged 40-64 years for breast cancer screening (n = 2929); and workers aged 30-64 years for cervical cancer screening (n = 4252). Cancer screening participation rates across occupational classes (upper nonmanual, lower nonmanual, and manual workers) were compared using the chi-square test. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs for nonparticipation, adjusted for sex, age, educational attainment, household income, and workplace scale. Upper nonmanual workers served as the reference group.

[RESULTS] Manual workers consistently had lower cancer screening participation rates. Compared with upper nonmanual workers, manual workers exhibited significantly higher PRs for nonparticipation in colorectal (PR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22), lung (PR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.34), stomach (PR = 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), and cervical cancer screenings (PR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.33). The disparities were particularly pronounced among male workers.

[CONCLUSIONS] Manual workers had lower cancer screening participation rates, particularly for colorectal, lung, stomach, and cervical cancer. Targeted interventions are needed to improve screening, particularly among manual workers, and reduce occupational disparities in cancer prevention and outcomes.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기