Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
123 patients with advanced G/GEJC at three institutions in China from August 2019 to June 2022.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
ICIs plus PTX, and 65 patients (52
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] In summary, ICIs plus PTX are as effective as ICIs plus OXA for treating advanced G/GEJC with manageable toxicity. The advantages of ICIs plus PTX in terms of adverse events (AEs) may support it as an alternative to ICIs plus OXA.
[BACKGROUND] For unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy [FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorou
- 95% CI 0.536-1.355
- HR 0.852
APA
Fang Y, Zhao Y, et al. (2025). Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.. Translational cancer research, 14(1), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-1089
MLA
Fang Y, et al.. "Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.." Translational cancer research, vol. 14, no. 1, 2025, pp. 327-339.
PMID
39974414 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] For unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (G/GEJC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy [FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and XELOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin)] are currently recommended as the standard first-line treatment. Research indicates that ICIs combined with paclitaxel have a synergistic effect, but the evidence is insufficient. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ICIs [mainly anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies] plus a paclitaxel-based chemotherapy regimen (ICIs plus PTX) an oxaliplatin-based regimen (ICIs plus OXA) as the first-line therapy for advanced G/GEJC.
[METHODS] This research involved 123 patients with advanced G/GEJC at three institutions in China from August 2019 to June 2022. The ICIs plus PTX group included 58 patients, whereas the ICIs plus OXA group included 65 patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens.
[RESULTS] Fifty-eight patients (47.2%) received ICIs plus PTX, and 65 patients (52.8%) received ICIs plus OXA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) [8.07 7.23 months; hazard ratio (HR) =0.845; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.568-1.257; P=0.40] and overall survival (OS) (14.83 15.10 months; HR =0.852; 95% CI: 0.536-1.355; P=0.50) were not significantly different between the ICIs plus PTX group and the ICIs plus OXA group. The objective response rate (ORR) (50.0% 53.8%, P=0.67) and disease control rate (DCR) (98.3% 93.8%, P=0.21) were also similar between the PTX and OXA groups, and both treatments exhibited manageable side effects. Subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics suggested that PFS HRs favored the ICIs plus PTX subgroup in patients aged <65 years or without liver metastasis.
[CONCLUSIONS] In summary, ICIs plus PTX are as effective as ICIs plus OXA for treating advanced G/GEJC with manageable toxicity. The advantages of ICIs plus PTX in terms of adverse events (AEs) may support it as an alternative to ICIs plus OXA.
[METHODS] This research involved 123 patients with advanced G/GEJC at three institutions in China from August 2019 to June 2022. The ICIs plus PTX group included 58 patients, whereas the ICIs plus OXA group included 65 patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of two treatment regimens.
[RESULTS] Fifty-eight patients (47.2%) received ICIs plus PTX, and 65 patients (52.8%) received ICIs plus OXA. The median progression-free survival (PFS) [8.07 7.23 months; hazard ratio (HR) =0.845; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.568-1.257; P=0.40] and overall survival (OS) (14.83 15.10 months; HR =0.852; 95% CI: 0.536-1.355; P=0.50) were not significantly different between the ICIs plus PTX group and the ICIs plus OXA group. The objective response rate (ORR) (50.0% 53.8%, P=0.67) and disease control rate (DCR) (98.3% 93.8%, P=0.21) were also similar between the PTX and OXA groups, and both treatments exhibited manageable side effects. Subgroup analysis based on patient characteristics suggested that PFS HRs favored the ICIs plus PTX subgroup in patients aged <65 years or without liver metastasis.
[CONCLUSIONS] In summary, ICIs plus PTX are as effective as ICIs plus OXA for treating advanced G/GEJC with manageable toxicity. The advantages of ICIs plus PTX in terms of adverse events (AEs) may support it as an alternative to ICIs plus OXA.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- [Progress of clinical trials on breast cancer in China, 2011-2022].
- Sparser2Sparse: Single-shot Sparser-to-Sparse Learning for Spatial Transcriptomics Imputation with Natural Image Co-learning.
- Multi-omics identification of therapeutic targets of compound sappan decoction in hepatocellular carcinoma.
- C1orf112 promotes breast cancer growth by modulating the cell cycle.
- Surgical resection versus non-surgical treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion.