본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis - Joint analysis of European GASTRODATA and American national cancer database.

American journal of surgery 2025 Vol.242() p. 116235

Pelc Z, Sędłak K, Endo Y, Van Sandick J, Gisbertz S, Pera M, Baiocchi GL, Morgagni P, Framarini M, Hoelscher A, Moenig S, Kołodziejczyk P, Gockel I, Piessen G, Eveno C, Da Costa PM, Davies A, Baker C, Allum W, Romario UF, Rosati R, Reim D, D'ugo D, Wijnhoven B, De Manzoni G, Kielan W, Schneider P, Badgwell BB, Pawlik TM, Polkowski W, Rawicz-Pruszyński K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Palliative chemotherapy is the current standard among advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), while the role of gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery and

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Pelc Z, Sędłak K, et al. (2025). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis - Joint analysis of European GASTRODATA and American national cancer database.. American journal of surgery, 242, 116235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116235
MLA Pelc Z, et al.. "Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis - Joint analysis of European GASTRODATA and American national cancer database.." American journal of surgery, vol. 242, 2025, pp. 116235.
PMID 39954554

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Palliative chemotherapy is the current standard among advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), while the role of gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC remains unclear. The current study aimed to assess treatment outcomes among GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using multinational cancer registries.

[METHODS] The analysis (2012-2022) included stage IV GC patients with PM undergoing gastrectomy and HIPEC from the European GASTRODATA Registry (EU cohort) and the American National Cancer Database (NCDB, U.S. cohort). The study outcomes were textbook oncological outcome (TOO) assessment and overall survival (OS).

[RESULTS] Among 193 patients, 49.7 ​% were from the EU cohort and 50.3 ​% from the U.S.

[COHORT] EU cohort had significantly higher rates of pT4 tumors (EU: 50 ​% vs U.S.: 40.2 ​%), metastatic lymph nodes (EU: 68.8 ​% vs U.S.: 54.6 ​%), and ≥16 lymph nodes evaluated (EU: 91.7 ​% vs U.S.: 68 ​%). Postoperatively, the EU cohort had longer hospital stay (EU: 53.1 ​% vs 22.2 ​%, p ​< ​0.001), with no significant differences in 30-day readmission (EU: 14.6 ​% vs U.S: 7.2 ​%, p ​= ​0.11) and 90-day mortality (EU: 4.2 ​% vs U.S.: 9.3 ​%, p ​= ​0.25). TOO rates were 30.2 ​% and 32 ​% for EU and U.S. cohorts, respectively. Within the U.S. cohort, TOO achievement was associated with improved 1- (86.7 ​% vs. 57.4 ​%), 3- (55.8 ​% vs. 29.7 ​%), and 5-year OS (50.2 ​% vs. 29.7 ​%) (p ​= ​0.0025) survival compared with non-TOO.

[CONCLUSIONS] Among patients with GC and PM undergoing gastrectomy and HIPEC, achievement of TOO was associated with decreased risk of postoperative complications (EU cohort) and improved long-term survival (U.S. cohort).

MeSH Terms

Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Male; Female; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy; Gastrectomy; Middle Aged; Aged; Europe; United States; Databases, Factual; Registries; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome; Survival Rate

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)