Efficacy of a linear stapler in entry hole closure during overlap anastomosis in minimally invasive gastrectomy.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
172 patients who underwent overlap anastomosis during laparoscopic or robot-assisted total gastrectomy (TG, Roux-en-Y) or distal gastrectomy (DG, Roux-en-Y/Billroth II) between February 2020 and September 2024.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
11 days, P = 0.01). [CONCLUSION] Using an LS to close the entry hole in an overlapping anastomosis during minimally invasive gastrectomy can reduce the anastomosis time and may be a safe option without increasing the risk of stenosis.
[BACKGROUND] Overlap anastomosis is widely used in gastrointestinal reconstruction during minimally invasive gastrectomy.
- p-value P < 0.001
- p-value P = 0.002
APA
Azumi Y, Urakawa N, et al. (2025). Efficacy of a linear stapler in entry hole closure during overlap anastomosis in minimally invasive gastrectomy.. Surgical endoscopy, 39(5), 3346-3353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11736-y
MLA
Azumi Y, et al.. "Efficacy of a linear stapler in entry hole closure during overlap anastomosis in minimally invasive gastrectomy.." Surgical endoscopy, vol. 39, no. 5, 2025, pp. 3346-3353.
PMID
40246760
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Overlap anastomosis is widely used in gastrointestinal reconstruction during minimally invasive gastrectomy. The entry hole of the anastomosis is typically closed with hand-sewn sutures because of concerns about stenosis. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of linear stapler (LS) closure with that of hand-sewn closure of the entry hole in overlap anastomosis.
[METHODS] We included 172 patients who underwent overlap anastomosis during laparoscopic or robot-assisted total gastrectomy (TG, Roux-en-Y) or distal gastrectomy (DG, Roux-en-Y/Billroth II) between February 2020 and September 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the method of entry hole closure: the suturing group (S group) and the LS group. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
[RESULTS] There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or tumor staging between the two groups. TG was performed in 46 and 17 patients in the S and LS groups, respectively, whereas DG was performed in 41 and 68 patients in the S and LS groups, respectively. In TG patients, there was no significant difference in operative time, but the esophageal-jejunal overlap anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the LS group (38.3 vs. 20.5 min, P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in both groups, and no cases of stenosis were observed in the LS group. In DG patients, the operative time and gastric-jejunal overlap anastomosis time were significantly shorter in the LS group (294 min vs. 253 min, P = 0.002; 28.5 vs. 9.0 min, P < 0.001). The length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LS group (13 vs. 11 days, P = 0.01).
[CONCLUSION] Using an LS to close the entry hole in an overlapping anastomosis during minimally invasive gastrectomy can reduce the anastomosis time and may be a safe option without increasing the risk of stenosis.
[METHODS] We included 172 patients who underwent overlap anastomosis during laparoscopic or robot-assisted total gastrectomy (TG, Roux-en-Y) or distal gastrectomy (DG, Roux-en-Y/Billroth II) between February 2020 and September 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the method of entry hole closure: the suturing group (S group) and the LS group. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.
[RESULTS] There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or tumor staging between the two groups. TG was performed in 46 and 17 patients in the S and LS groups, respectively, whereas DG was performed in 41 and 68 patients in the S and LS groups, respectively. In TG patients, there was no significant difference in operative time, but the esophageal-jejunal overlap anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the LS group (38.3 vs. 20.5 min, P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in both groups, and no cases of stenosis were observed in the LS group. In DG patients, the operative time and gastric-jejunal overlap anastomosis time were significantly shorter in the LS group (294 min vs. 253 min, P = 0.002; 28.5 vs. 9.0 min, P < 0.001). The length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LS group (13 vs. 11 days, P = 0.01).
[CONCLUSION] Using an LS to close the entry hole in an overlapping anastomosis during minimally invasive gastrectomy can reduce the anastomosis time and may be a safe option without increasing the risk of stenosis.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Gastrectomy; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Aged; Laparoscopy; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications; Stomach Neoplasms; Surgical Staplers; Anastomosis, Surgical; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Suture Techniques; Treatment Outcome; Jejunum; Surgical Stapling; Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y