A multicenter randomized open-label phase 2 study investigating optimal antiemetic therapy for patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: the EN-hance study.
[BACKGROUND] Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer and other indications in several countries an
APA
Aoyama T, Ooki A, et al. (2025). A multicenter randomized open-label phase 2 study investigating optimal antiemetic therapy for patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: the EN-hance study.. International journal of clinical oncology, 30(6), 1162-1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02748-8
MLA
Aoyama T, et al.. "A multicenter randomized open-label phase 2 study investigating optimal antiemetic therapy for patients with advanced/recurrent gastric cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: the EN-hance study.." International journal of clinical oncology, vol. 30, no. 6, 2025, pp. 1162-1173.
PMID
40293658
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has been approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer and other indications in several countries and is considered moderately or highly emetogenic. The management of nausea and vomiting associated with T-DXd treatment has not been fully evaluated and the effectiveness of conventional prophylaxis remains unknown.
[METHODS] This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the optimal antiemetic therapy for Japanese patients with gastric cancer undergoing T-DXd treatment. Patients were randomized to a doublet regimen group (dexamethasone and palonosetron) or triplet regimen group (aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron) at a ratio of one to one, stratified by sex, gastrectomy status, and study institution. Both antiemetic treatments were administered from day 1 before T-DXd administration, and emetic events and nausea were observed for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the antiemetic complete response (CR) rate to assess control for emetic events based on voluntary patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during cycle 1 (1-21 days).
[RESULTS] Of the 60 enrolled patients, 58 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis (29 patients in each regimen group). The overall CR rates for the doublet and triplet regimens were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients), respectively, and neither regimen met the pre-specified threshold (> 18/29 patients). The CR rate in the acute phase (0-24 h) was 86.2% (25/29 patients) for both regimens, and the CR rates in the delayed phase (2-21 days) were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients) for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] Given that the primary endpoint was not met, further research is needed to better characterize nausea and vomiting with T-DXd to tailor an anti-emetic regimen that suits the needs of the patients.
[METHODS] This open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the optimal antiemetic therapy for Japanese patients with gastric cancer undergoing T-DXd treatment. Patients were randomized to a doublet regimen group (dexamethasone and palonosetron) or triplet regimen group (aprepitant, dexamethasone, and palonosetron) at a ratio of one to one, stratified by sex, gastrectomy status, and study institution. Both antiemetic treatments were administered from day 1 before T-DXd administration, and emetic events and nausea were observed for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the antiemetic complete response (CR) rate to assess control for emetic events based on voluntary patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during cycle 1 (1-21 days).
[RESULTS] Of the 60 enrolled patients, 58 were eligible for inclusion in this analysis (29 patients in each regimen group). The overall CR rates for the doublet and triplet regimens were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients), respectively, and neither regimen met the pre-specified threshold (> 18/29 patients). The CR rate in the acute phase (0-24 h) was 86.2% (25/29 patients) for both regimens, and the CR rates in the delayed phase (2-21 days) were 41.4% (12/29 patients) and 37.9% (11/29 patients) for the doublet and triplet regimens, respectively.
[CONCLUSIONS] Given that the primary endpoint was not met, further research is needed to better characterize nausea and vomiting with T-DXd to tailor an anti-emetic regimen that suits the needs of the patients.
MeSH Terms
Adult; Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Antiemetics; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Immunoconjugates; Nausea; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Palonosetron; Stomach Neoplasms; Trastuzumab; Vomiting; Camptothecin
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Postoperative Bleeding After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet and/or Anticoagulation Treatment.
- Clinicopathological Features and Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Resection Margin Positivity After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.
- Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Patients With Gastric Cancer who Are Positive for Peritoneal Lavage Cytology and Negative for Other Distant Metastasis.
- Clinical Features, Prognosis, and Prognostic Factors of Remnant Gastric Cancer Patients Who Received Potentially Curative Gastrectomy.
- Adjuvant Treatment for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.