Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
surgical resection following neoadjuvant FLOT treatment
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
추출되지 않음
[BACKGROUND/AIM] Perioperative FLOT is considered the gold standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer.
- 95% CI 0.30-1.33
- HR 0.63
- 추적기간 16.1 months
APA
Ceylan F, Şener Dede D, et al. (2025). Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.. Turkish journal of medical sciences, 55(3), 547-558. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6002
MLA
Ceylan F, et al.. "Comparative efficacy of adjuvant FOLFOX vs. FLOT following neoadjuvant FLOT in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.." Turkish journal of medical sciences, vol. 55, no. 3, 2025, pp. 547-558.
PMID
40686717 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND/AIM] Perioperative FLOT is considered the gold standard treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. However, in the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy intolerance has brought de-escalation strategies to the forefront as an important area of research. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of adjuvant FLOT and FOLFOX regimens in enhancing survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection following neoadjuvant FLOT treatment.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4, N0-3) who received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2018 and September 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared to patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOT. Clinical variables such as disease stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy were also analyzed to determine their impact on DFS and OS.
[RESULTS] The analysis included 171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.1 months. At 16 months, the DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. Of the 171 patients, 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. However, the advanced disease stage and lack of pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT were associated with decreased DFS and OS, highlighting these factors as potential prognostic indicators.
[CONCLUSION] Among patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT, adjuvant FOLFOX showed comparable efficacy to FLOT, suggesting its potential as an alternative option, particularly for patients with deteriorated ECOG PS or those who developed chemotherapy intolerance postoperatively. These findings inform treatment strategies and optimize adjuvant therapy selection based on individual patient profiles.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (cT2-4, N0-3) who received four cycles of neoadjuvant FLOT and subsequently underwent surgery at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital between January 2018 and September 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were compared to patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX or FLOT. Clinical variables such as disease stage and response to neoadjuvant therapy were also analyzed to determine their impact on DFS and OS.
[RESULTS] The analysis included 171 patients, with a median age of 59 years and a median follow-up duration of 16.1 months. At 16 months, the DFS and OS rates were 66% and 82%, respectively. Of the 171 patients, 105 received adjuvant FLOT, 37 received FOLFOX, and 29 received no adjuvant therapy. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in DFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.30-1.33, p = 0.229) or OS (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.37, p = 0.635) between the FLOT and FOLFOX groups. However, the advanced disease stage and lack of pathological response to neoadjuvant FLOT were associated with decreased DFS and OS, highlighting these factors as potential prognostic indicators.
[CONCLUSION] Among patients undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant FLOT, adjuvant FOLFOX showed comparable efficacy to FLOT, suggesting its potential as an alternative option, particularly for patients with deteriorated ECOG PS or those who developed chemotherapy intolerance postoperatively. These findings inform treatment strategies and optimize adjuvant therapy selection based on individual patient profiles.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Association of patient health education with the postoperative health related quality of life in low- intermediate recurrence risk differentiated thyroid cancer patients.
- Early local immune activation following intra-operative radiotherapy in human breast tissue.