Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
109 patients (37 females [33.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between April 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In conclusion, minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly robotic gastrectomy, provide a safe and oncologically adequate alternative to open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer.
[AIM] Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer, which ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally.
- p-value P = 0.012
- p-value P < 0.001
APA
Yaman S, Teke Z, et al. (2025). Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer.. Journal of minimal access surgery, 21(3), 256-264. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_254_24
MLA
Yaman S, et al.. "Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes in open, laparoscopic and robotic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer.." Journal of minimal access surgery, vol. 21, no. 3, 2025, pp. 256-264.
PMID
40653720 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[AIM] Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for gastric cancer, which ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally. Although minimally invasive surgical techniques are gaining popularity, their safety and oncological adequacy remain subjects of ongoing debate. This study aims to contribute to the medical literature by comparing open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy techniques in the treatment of gastric cancer, focusing on short-term oncological outcomes.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between April 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. The patients were categorised into three groups based on the surgical approach: open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy. Demographic data, intraoperative and post-operative findings, tumour characteristics and short-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were analysed retrospectively.
[RESULTS] A total of 109 patients (37 females [33.9%] and 72 males [66.1%]) with a mean age of 63.1 ± 11.4 years were included. The operative time was significantly shorter in the open gastrectomy group compared to the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P = 0.012). The initiation of oral intake and post-operative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the robotic gastrectomy group (P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, disease-free survival rates were higher, and mortality rates were lower in the robotic gastrectomy group compared to the other groups (P = 0.030). Furthermore, the completion rate of adjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the other groups (P = 0.008).
[CONCLUSION] In conclusion, minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly robotic gastrectomy, provide a safe and oncologically adequate alternative to open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. These methods can be safely employed in selected patients by experienced teams at high-volume centres.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Patients aged 18 years and older who underwent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma at our institution between April 2020 and September 2022 were included in the study. The patients were categorised into three groups based on the surgical approach: open gastrectomy, laparoscopic gastrectomy and robotic gastrectomy. Demographic data, intraoperative and post-operative findings, tumour characteristics and short-term morbidity and mortality outcomes were analysed retrospectively.
[RESULTS] A total of 109 patients (37 females [33.9%] and 72 males [66.1%]) with a mean age of 63.1 ± 11.4 years were included. The operative time was significantly shorter in the open gastrectomy group compared to the laparoscopic and robotic groups (P = 0.012). The initiation of oral intake and post-operative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the robotic gastrectomy group (P < 0.001). At 1-year follow-up, disease-free survival rates were higher, and mortality rates were lower in the robotic gastrectomy group compared to the other groups (P = 0.030). Furthermore, the completion rate of adjuvant therapy was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the other groups (P = 0.008).
[CONCLUSION] In conclusion, minimally invasive surgical techniques, particularly robotic gastrectomy, provide a safe and oncologically adequate alternative to open surgery for the treatment of gastric cancer. These methods can be safely employed in selected patients by experienced teams at high-volume centres.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
- Blocking SHP2 benefits FGFR2 inhibitor and overcomes its resistance in -amplified gastric cancer.
- Association of preoperative frailty and prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium in elderly gastric cancer patients: A single-center observational study.
- Treating a single tumor deposits as two lymph node metastases can improve the accuracy of gastric cancer prognosis assessment.
- Complete response to Nivolumab-based chemotherapy in a case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events.
- Apatinib and silver nanoparticles synergize against gastric cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis.