Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high-risk and cytology positive gastric cancer: a systematic review.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
158 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Our results suggest that the neoadjuvant IPC has efficacy and is safe, with high rates of cytology conversion (in cytology-positive disease), low rates of peritoneal recurrence (in locally advanced disease).
[BACKGROUND] Gastric cancer has a risk of early transcoelomic spread.
- 연구 설계 systematic review
APA
Desmond B, Alukaidey L, et al. (2025). Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high-risk and cytology positive gastric cancer: a systematic review.. Surgical oncology, 61, 102237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102237
MLA
Desmond B, et al.. "Neoadjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high-risk and cytology positive gastric cancer: a systematic review.." Surgical oncology, vol. 61, 2025, pp. 102237.
PMID
40446563 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Gastric cancer has a risk of early transcoelomic spread. Despite perioperative chemotherapy and surgery, peritoneal recurrence is a frequent contributor to mortality. The addition of neoadjuvant normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) allows early treatment of microscopic disease. Our study aims to systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant IPC in patients with gastric cancer who are at high risk of peritoneal recurrence.
[METHODS] A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for relevant papers. The primary outcomes were the rates of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients treated with neoadjuvant IPC. Secondary outcomes focused on adverse effects and toxicity.
[RESULTS] Overall, 562 manuscripts were screened and 7 papers were included, totalling 158 patients. For cytology-positive patients, the addition of IPC led to a conversion to negative cytology and radical surgery in 78-89 %. This was associated with relatively high DFS and OS. Peritoneal-specific recurrence was higher in cohorts who initially had cytology-positive disease (63-69 %) compared to those who did not (0-29 %). Our data suggest that OS is lower in patients who were initially cytology-positive compared to cytology-negative disease. Importantly, neoadjuvant IPC did not appear to significantly increase treatment-related adverse events.
[CONCLUSION] Our results suggest that the neoadjuvant IPC has efficacy and is safe, with high rates of cytology conversion (in cytology-positive disease), low rates of peritoneal recurrence (in locally advanced disease). This was associated with substantial improvements in DFS and OS, compared to current standard treatment regimens.
[METHODS] A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for relevant papers. The primary outcomes were the rates of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients treated with neoadjuvant IPC. Secondary outcomes focused on adverse effects and toxicity.
[RESULTS] Overall, 562 manuscripts were screened and 7 papers were included, totalling 158 patients. For cytology-positive patients, the addition of IPC led to a conversion to negative cytology and radical surgery in 78-89 %. This was associated with relatively high DFS and OS. Peritoneal-specific recurrence was higher in cohorts who initially had cytology-positive disease (63-69 %) compared to those who did not (0-29 %). Our data suggest that OS is lower in patients who were initially cytology-positive compared to cytology-negative disease. Importantly, neoadjuvant IPC did not appear to significantly increase treatment-related adverse events.
[CONCLUSION] Our results suggest that the neoadjuvant IPC has efficacy and is safe, with high rates of cytology conversion (in cytology-positive disease), low rates of peritoneal recurrence (in locally advanced disease). This was associated with substantial improvements in DFS and OS, compared to current standard treatment regimens.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- A Phase I Study of Hydroxychloroquine and Suba-Itraconazole in Men with Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer (HITMAN-PC): Dose Escalation Results.
- Self-management of male urinary symptoms: qualitative findings from a primary care trial.
- Clinical and Liquid Biomarkers of 20-Year Prostate Cancer Risk in Men Aged 45 to 70 Years.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Ga-PSMA PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI for preoperative pelvic invasion in the patients with prostate cancer.
- Comprehensive analysis of androgen receptor splice variant target gene expression in prostate cancer.
- Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Thyroid Cancer.