Effect of prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
메타분석
1/5 보강
[BACKGROUND] Gastric and oesophageal cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality globally.
- 95% CI 0.31-0.58
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Lubbad O, Mahmood WU, et al. (2025). Effect of prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 17(9), 109033. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i9.109033
MLA
Lubbad O, et al.. "Effect of prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.." World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, vol. 17, no. 9, 2025, pp. 109033.
PMID
40979058 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Gastric and oesophageal cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality globally. Treatment in the form of surgical resection and neoadjuvant therapy is considered the gold standard; however, these procedures are associated with significant postoperative morbidity and prolonged recovery times. Prehabilitation aims to combat this by physically and psychologically optimising patients preoperatively to handle the stress of surgery and improve postoperative outcomes.
[AIM] To evaluate the effectiveness of prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections.
[METHODS] Standard medical databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched to find randomised, controlled trials comparing prehabilitation no-prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections. All data were analysed using Review Manager Software 5.4, and the meta-analysis was performed with a random-effect model analysis.
[RESULTS] A total of 16 studies were included ( = 1479), recruiting adult patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections. In the random effect model analysis, prehabilitation was associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to no prehabilitation (Odds ratio: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.31-0.58, = 25.28, < 0.00001). Additionally, prehabilitation was associated with a lower postoperative readmission rate (risk ratio: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.35-0.96, = 2.10, = 0.04) and a shorter length of stay [standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.19, 95%CI: -0.37 to -0.02, = 2.21, = 0.03] compared to no-prehabilitation. Prehabilitation was also found to improve preoperative 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD) compared to no-prehabilitation (SMD: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.21-1.23, = 2.75, = 0.006). No statistical difference was found in postoperative 6-MWD, mortality, and severe complications.
[CONCLUSION] Prehabilitation was found to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity and improving preoperative physical health in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections.
[AIM] To evaluate the effectiveness of prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections.
[METHODS] Standard medical databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched to find randomised, controlled trials comparing prehabilitation no-prehabilitation in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections. All data were analysed using Review Manager Software 5.4, and the meta-analysis was performed with a random-effect model analysis.
[RESULTS] A total of 16 studies were included ( = 1479), recruiting adult patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections. In the random effect model analysis, prehabilitation was associated with fewer postoperative complications compared to no prehabilitation (Odds ratio: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.31-0.58, = 25.28, < 0.00001). Additionally, prehabilitation was associated with a lower postoperative readmission rate (risk ratio: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.35-0.96, = 2.10, = 0.04) and a shorter length of stay [standardised mean difference (SMD): -0.19, 95%CI: -0.37 to -0.02, = 2.21, = 0.03] compared to no-prehabilitation. Prehabilitation was also found to improve preoperative 6-minute walking distance (6-MWD) compared to no-prehabilitation (SMD: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.21-1.23, = 2.75, = 0.006). No statistical difference was found in postoperative 6-MWD, mortality, and severe complications.
[CONCLUSION] Prehabilitation was found to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity and improving preoperative physical health in patients undergoing gastric or oesophageal cancer resections.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
- Blocking SHP2 benefits FGFR2 inhibitor and overcomes its resistance in -amplified gastric cancer.
- Association of preoperative frailty and prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium in elderly gastric cancer patients: A single-center observational study.
- Complete response to Nivolumab-based chemotherapy in a case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events.
- Apatinib and silver nanoparticles synergize against gastric cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis.
- Correction: Survival disparities and predictors in gastric cancer: a population-based study from Kazakhstan (2012-2023).