본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

DNA methylation profiles predicting response to anti-PD-1-based treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BMC medicine 2025 Vol.23(1) p. 529

Tang W, Zhu Z, Wang Z, Li G, Lin Q, Cai S, Chen C, Wang Z

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Immunotherapy has shown promise in treating gastric cancer (GC), yet predicting its efficacy remains challenging.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 28
  • p-value p < 0.05

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Tang W, Zhu Z, et al. (2025). DNA methylation profiles predicting response to anti-PD-1-based treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.. BMC medicine, 23(1), 529. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04357-8
MLA Tang W, et al.. "DNA methylation profiles predicting response to anti-PD-1-based treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.." BMC medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, 2025, pp. 529.
PMID 41034874

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Immunotherapy has shown promise in treating gastric cancer (GC), yet predicting its efficacy remains challenging. Here we investigated DNA methylation as a predictive marker for response of anti-PD-1-based treatment in GC.

[METHODS] A total of 99 GC patients treated with first-line anti-PD-1-based treatment were enrolled. In the model construction phase, 30 samples were analyzed using the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip (850 K array) and 41 samples using Targeted Bisulfite Sequencing (TBS). Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selector Operation (LASSO) were applied to identify differential CpG methylation probes (DMPs). Seven machine learning models were developed, and their performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic and survival analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis provided interpretability of the model. In the model validation phase, a temporally independent cohort of 28 samples underwent TBS for external validation.

[RESULTS] The 850 K array identified 523 DMPs, of which 20 were selected as most significant for treatment response. The iMETH model, based on the k-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm, showed optimal predictive value in both training (AUC = 0.99) and testing (AUC = 0.96) sets. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in responders predicted by iMETH (all log-rank test p < 0.05). SHAP identified cg06692537 as one of the most important features, indicating that hypomethylation of this probe was associated with a likelihood of benefiting from anti-PD-1 based therapy. The model's robustness was confirmed in the validation set (n = 28, AUC = 0.83).  CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that DNA methylation markers can serve as valuable predictors of first-line immunotherapy in GC. The iMETH model, which incorporates 20 DNA methylation CpG probes, effectively predicts patient responses to first-line anti-PD-1-based treatment. This model holds promise for guiding personalized treatment strategies and has the potential for practical application in clinical settings.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; DNA Methylation; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Biomarkers, Tumor

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)