Resection margin strategy and surgical practices in gastric cancer surgery: the European REMARCS (Resection MARgin for cancer of the stomach) survey.
설문조사
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
추출되지 않음
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
from 172 surgeons at 154 centers across 19 countries
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] This survey reveals a heterogeneity in applying the current guidelines for resection margin lengths across European centers. Further prospective studies are essential to evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of future organ-sparing strategies.
ℹ️ 이 논문은 무료 전문이 아직 없습니다. 코퍼스 전체의 43.9%는 무료 가능 (통계 →) · 🏥 기관 EZproxy로 시도
[BACKGROUND] The appropriate distance to the resection margin in gastric cancer surgery remains debated and is often based on limited or outdated evidence.
APA
Chevallay M, Berlth F, et al. (2025). Resection margin strategy and surgical practices in gastric cancer surgery: the European REMARCS (Resection MARgin for cancer of the stomach) survey.. International journal of surgery (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000004050
MLA
Chevallay M, et al.. "Resection margin strategy and surgical practices in gastric cancer surgery: the European REMARCS (Resection MARgin for cancer of the stomach) survey.." International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025.
PMID
41231629 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] The appropriate distance to the resection margin in gastric cancer surgery remains debated and is often based on limited or outdated evidence. With evolving perioperative strategies, this study aimed to assess current resection margin practices across European centers.
[METHOD] A web-based survey consisting of 45 questions was developed by a panel of 13 international experts including surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists. It covered center demographics, resection margin strategies, and postoperative care. Distributed from January to June 2022, the survey targeted Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons via mailing lists and social media platforms of various UGI and visceral surgical societies.
[RESULTS] Responses were received from 172 surgeons at 154 centers across 19 countries. Of these respondents, 54% were from university hospitals, 39% from general hospitals, and 8% from private hospitals. Surgeons had on average 20.8 (SD ± 9.4) years of surgical experience and managed an average of 23.2 (SD ± 21.8) cases per year. For intestinal-type tumors, 77% of surgeons reported using a proximal margin of at least 5 cm, with 64% selecting exactly 5 cm. For diffuse type gastric cancer, 63% of surgeons recommended a minimum of 8 cm. There was no difference with respect to the recommended distance to the resection margin between low, medium and high-volume surgeons or between university, general and private hospitals. Routine macroscopic inspection of the specimen was performed by 64% of respondents.
[CONCLUSION] This survey reveals a heterogeneity in applying the current guidelines for resection margin lengths across European centers. Further prospective studies are essential to evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of future organ-sparing strategies.
[METHOD] A web-based survey consisting of 45 questions was developed by a panel of 13 international experts including surgeons, pathologists, and oncologists. It covered center demographics, resection margin strategies, and postoperative care. Distributed from January to June 2022, the survey targeted Upper Gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons via mailing lists and social media platforms of various UGI and visceral surgical societies.
[RESULTS] Responses were received from 172 surgeons at 154 centers across 19 countries. Of these respondents, 54% were from university hospitals, 39% from general hospitals, and 8% from private hospitals. Surgeons had on average 20.8 (SD ± 9.4) years of surgical experience and managed an average of 23.2 (SD ± 21.8) cases per year. For intestinal-type tumors, 77% of surgeons reported using a proximal margin of at least 5 cm, with 64% selecting exactly 5 cm. For diffuse type gastric cancer, 63% of surgeons recommended a minimum of 8 cm. There was no difference with respect to the recommended distance to the resection margin between low, medium and high-volume surgeons or between university, general and private hospitals. Routine macroscopic inspection of the specimen was performed by 64% of respondents.
[CONCLUSION] This survey reveals a heterogeneity in applying the current guidelines for resection margin lengths across European centers. Further prospective studies are essential to evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of future organ-sparing strategies.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
- Blocking SHP2 benefits FGFR2 inhibitor and overcomes its resistance in -amplified gastric cancer.
- Association of preoperative frailty and prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium in elderly gastric cancer patients: A single-center observational study.
- Complete response to Nivolumab-based chemotherapy in a case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events.
- Apatinib and silver nanoparticles synergize against gastric cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis.
- Correction: Survival disparities and predictors in gastric cancer: a population-based study from Kazakhstan (2012-2023).