본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Outcomes of Selective Versus Routine Gastric Tube Decompression After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Pyloric Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

코호트 1/5 보강
Journal of clinical medicine 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 34/34 OA 2022: 61/61 OA 2023: 78/78 OA 2024: 135/135 OA 2025: 265/265 OA 2026: 192/192 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.15(1)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: pyloric obstruction remains controversial
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
gastrectomy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Preoperative fasting duration and nutritional status are key predictors for prolonged GT need. A selective GT strategy, guided by these parameters, is recommended to optimize recovery and resource utilization, aligning with ERAS principles.

Xu Y, Liu Y, Kong P, Fang Y, Xu D

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

: The utility of routine gastric tube (GT) placement following gastrectomy in gastric cancer (GC) patients with pyloric obstruction remains controversial.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 1.10-1.45
  • HR 1.27
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Xu Y, Liu Y, et al. (2025). Outcomes of Selective Versus Routine Gastric Tube Decompression After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Pyloric Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. Journal of clinical medicine, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010276
MLA Xu Y, et al.. "Outcomes of Selective Versus Routine Gastric Tube Decompression After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer with Pyloric Obstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.." Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025.
PMID 41517525 ↗
DOI 10.3390/jcm15010276

Abstract

: The utility of routine gastric tube (GT) placement following gastrectomy in gastric cancer (GC) patients with pyloric obstruction remains controversial. This practice conflicts with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles, and its value in this high-risk subgroup is unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of routine versus selective gastric tube use in these patients, and to identify predictors for prolonged gastric tube retention. : A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on 133 GC patients with pyloric obstruction who underwent gastrectomy. Patients were stratified into GT ( = 63) and non-GT ( = 70) groups. Primary outcomes included 30-day complications, 90-day mortality, hospitalization duration, and costs. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of prolonged GT retention. : Routine GT use provided no clinical benefit, with similar 30-day complication (22.2% vs. 22.9%, = 0.945) and 90-day mortality (1.6% vs. 0%, = 0.290) rates. However, it was associated with a significantly prolonged postoperative hospital stay (8.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.0 ± 4.2 days, = 0.034) and a mean cost increase of ¥5900 per patient ( = 0.006). A dose-response relationship was evident: each additional day of GT retention correlated with 0.57 extra hospital days (r = 0.567, < 0.001) and ¥3600 in added costs (r = 0.360, = 0.004). Multivariable analysis identified longer preoperative fasting time (Adjusted HR = 1.27 per hour, 95% CI: 1.10-1.45, = 0.001) and GLIM-defined malnutrition (Adjusted HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.02-4.17, = 0.045) as independent predictors for prolonged GT retention. : Routine GT placement after gastrectomy in obstructed GC patients increases healthcare costs and prolongs hospitalization without improving clinical outcomes. Preoperative fasting duration and nutritional status are key predictors for prolonged GT need. A selective GT strategy, guided by these parameters, is recommended to optimize recovery and resource utilization, aligning with ERAS principles.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기