본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2026 Vol.29(1) p. 205-219

Shin HJ, Song JH, Kim SE, Lee IS, Kim HI, Lee HH, Jeong O, Jung MR, Hur H

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Palliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.85-0.94
  • RR 0.90

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Shin HJ, Song JH, et al. (2026). Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 29(1), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01676-w
MLA Shin HJ, et al.. "Clinical impact of gastrectomy in surgically proven stage IV gastric cancers: retrospective analysis from Korean multicenter dataset (PASS-META).." Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, vol. 29, no. 1, 2026, pp. 205-219.
PMID 41110017

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Palliative resection for metastatic gastric cancer is not recommended in current practice guidelines; however, it is frequently performed based on clinical considerations. Prospective trials face challenges, necessitating large-scale retrospective analyses to provide clinical evidence.

[METHODS] The PASS-META study group established a cohort of 983 patients with gastric cancer with surgically confirmed metastatic lesions treated at five major Korean institutions from 2014 to 2021, collecting 126 variables from preoperative, operative, and postoperative data through hospital records. The correlation between gastrectomy and survival outcomes was investigated using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and standardization to estimate counterfactual outcomes.

[RESULTS] Machine learning-based imputation and statistical causal survival analysis revealed that gastrectomy was found to significantly improve survival in patients with limited peritoneal metastasis (P1 or P2; RR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), as well as in those with distant lymph node metastasis (dLN1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.91-0.94) and hepatic metastasis (H1; RR: 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.00), suggesting a potential survival advantage across these subgroups. No survival benefit was observed in patients with severe peritoneal metastasis (P3). Among patients with P1-P2 metastasis, extensive lymph node dissection improved the 5-year survival rates compared with limited dissection, whereas minimally invasive surgery did not affect the survival outcome. Although gastrectomy increased the postoperative hospital stay and delayed the initiation of the first postoperative chemotherapy compared to patients without gastrectomy, it did not affect the total number of chemotherapy cycles.

[CONCLUSION] This study suggests that gastrectomy offers a significant survival benefit to patients with surgically proven stage IV gastric cancer and limited peritoneal metastasis (P1/P2), distant lymph node (dLN1), or hepatic metastases (H1). Furthermore, specific surgical procedures such as extended lymph node dissection or minimally invasive surgery may be considered for patients undergoing gastrectomy.

MeSH Terms

Aged; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Gastrectomy; Liver Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Prognosis; Republic of Korea; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)