Impact of prophylactic drain placement on intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy: nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.
코호트
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
750 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 196,660 (90.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2014 and March 2022 were included
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative percutaneous drainage or hospital stay duration. [CONCLUSION] This study suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage was associated with a reduced incidence of intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy without increasing hospitalization duration or medical costs.
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to evaluate the impact of drain placement on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrectomy.
- 연구 설계 cohort study
APA
Kouzu K, Aso S, et al. (2026). Impact of prophylactic drain placement on intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy: nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 29(1), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01686-8
MLA
Kouzu K, et al.. "Impact of prophylactic drain placement on intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy: nationwide inpatient database study in Japan.." Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, vol. 29, no. 1, 2026, pp. 230-237.
PMID
41222795
Abstract
[OBJECTIVE] This study aimed to evaluate the impact of drain placement on the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing gastrectomy.
[BACKGROUND] The effectiveness of prophylactic abdominal drain placement in gastrectomy remains unclear. Nevertheless, they are still commonly used following gastrectomy.
[METHODS] We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2014 and March 2022 were included. We applied overlap weighting based on propensity scores to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the incidence of intra-abdominal infections. Secondary outcomes included postoperative percutaneous drainage, in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.
[RESULTS] A total of 217,750 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 196,660 (90.3%) received prophylactic abdominal drains. After overlap weighting, the drain group had a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal infections compared to the no-drain group (6.3% vs. 7.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.7 to - 1.0). The prophylactic drains were also associated with reduced in-hospital postoperative mortality (0.6% vs. 0.8%; 95% CI - 0.3 to - 0.1). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative percutaneous drainage or hospital stay duration.
[CONCLUSION] This study suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage was associated with a reduced incidence of intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy without increasing hospitalization duration or medical costs.
[BACKGROUND] The effectiveness of prophylactic abdominal drain placement in gastrectomy remains unclear. Nevertheless, they are still commonly used following gastrectomy.
[METHODS] We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2014 and March 2022 were included. We applied overlap weighting based on propensity scores to adjust for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was the incidence of intra-abdominal infections. Secondary outcomes included postoperative percutaneous drainage, in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.
[RESULTS] A total of 217,750 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 196,660 (90.3%) received prophylactic abdominal drains. After overlap weighting, the drain group had a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal infections compared to the no-drain group (6.3% vs. 7.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.7 to - 1.0). The prophylactic drains were also associated with reduced in-hospital postoperative mortality (0.6% vs. 0.8%; 95% CI - 0.3 to - 0.1). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative percutaneous drainage or hospital stay duration.
[CONCLUSION] This study suggests that prophylactic abdominal drainage was associated with a reduced incidence of intra-abdominal infections after gastrectomy without increasing hospitalization duration or medical costs.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Gastrectomy; Female; Male; Retrospective Studies; Japan; Aged; Drainage; Stomach Neoplasms; Intraabdominal Infections; Postoperative Complications; Middle Aged; Incidence; Databases, Factual; Length of Stay; Hospital Mortality; Inpatients