본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent early gastric cancer after endoscopic resection: analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association 2026 Vol.29(1) p. 169-176

Hiramatsu T, Kakushima N, Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Hirasawa T, Takeuchi Y, Ishido K, Hoteya S, Yano T, Tanaka S, Toya Y, Nakagawa M, Yoshizaki T, Yoshida N, Hirasawa K, Matsuda M, Yamamoto H, Yokoi C, Ohnita K, Hisanaga Y, Shimazu T, Ono H, Tanabe S, Kondo H, Iishi H, Ninomiya M, Oda I

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] We aimed to reveal the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for locally recurrent early gastric cancer (LRGC) after ER using the data obtained in a Japanese multicenter prospective cohor

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p<0.0001
  • p-value p<0.05
  • 95% CI 0.24-1.41
  • 연구 설계 cohort study

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Hiramatsu T, Kakushima N, et al. (2026). Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent early gastric cancer after endoscopic resection: analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study.. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 29(1), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-025-01684-w
MLA Hiramatsu T, et al.. "Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for locally recurrent early gastric cancer after endoscopic resection: analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study.." Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, vol. 29, no. 1, 2026, pp. 169-176.
PMID 41240283

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] We aimed to reveal the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) for locally recurrent early gastric cancer (LRGC) after ER using the data obtained in a Japanese multicenter prospective cohort study of ER for early gastric cancer (EGC) using Web registry (J-WEB/EGC).

[METHODS] Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between 125 LRGCs (119 patients) and 9387 primary EGCs of naive stomach (8455 patients) enrolled in this study at 41 centers between July 2010 and June 2012. We calculated 5-year overall survival rates (OS) and disease-specific survival rates (DSS) for LRGC, divided ERs into curative and noncurative resections, and calculated hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality with Cox regression analysis.

[RESULTS] For LRGCs and primary EGCs, median resection times were 100 and 77 min (p<0.0001), en-bloc resection rates were 97.6% and 99.5% (p<0.05), and R0 resection rates were 86.4% and 93.3% (p<0.05), respectively. There were no significant differences for adverse events between LRGC and primary EGC. Five-year OS and DSS for LRGC cases were 89.9% and 100%. Compared to curatively resected primary EGC cases, HR for all-cause mortality of curatively resected LRGC, noncuratively resected primary EGC and noncuratively resected LRGC cases were 0.58 (95% CI 0.24-1.41), 1.46 (1.25-1.7) and 3.02 (1.43-6.36), respectively.

[CONCLUSIONS] A curative ER for LRGC offers the same long-term prognosis as primary EGC. ER for LRGC can offer a secure and radical treatment.

MeSH Terms

Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Endoscopic Mucosal Resection; Follow-Up Studies; Japan; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)