본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Circulating tumor DNA informs clinical practice in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastroesophageal cancers.

1/5 보강
Cancer 📖 저널 OA 36.7% 2022: 2/2 OA 2023: 1/3 OA 2024: 5/12 OA 2025: 32/73 OA 2026: 42/108 OA 2022~2026 2026 Vol.132(1) p. e70242
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
200 patients with recurrent/metastatic EGCs who underwent commercial ctDNA testing using a personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
commercial ctDNA testing using a personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[RESULTS] In cohort A, 31 of 36 patients (86.1%) had ctDNA collected ≤90 days before recurrence; of these, 25 of 31 patients (80.65%) were ctDNA-positive before recurrence.

Mehta R, Rivero-Hinojosa S, Dayyani F, Ferguson J, Shariff B, Aushev VN, Budde GL, Ortiz JB, George GV, Sharma S, Jurdi AA, Liu MC, Drengler RL, Klempner SJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a valuable biomarker for assessing treatment response and molecular residual disease.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 36
  • p-value p < .0001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Mehta R, Rivero-Hinojosa S, et al. (2026). Circulating tumor DNA informs clinical practice in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastroesophageal cancers.. Cancer, 132(1), e70242. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.70242
MLA Mehta R, et al.. "Circulating tumor DNA informs clinical practice in patients with recurrent/metastatic gastroesophageal cancers.." Cancer, vol. 132, no. 1, 2026, pp. e70242.
PMID 41485117 ↗
DOI 10.1002/cncr.70242

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a valuable biomarker for assessing treatment response and molecular residual disease. In advanced esophageal and gastric cancer (gastroesophageal cancer [EGC]), ctDNA dynamics remain poorly understood. The authors investigated ctDNA in patients with advanced EGC to evaluate its clinical utility.

[METHODS] This was a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis of 200 patients with recurrent/metastatic EGCs who underwent commercial ctDNA testing using a personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera; Natera, Inc.). Patients were divided into cohort A (N = 36; stage I-III with recurrence) or cohort B (N = 164; metastatic at diagnosis). Longitudinal ctDNA dynamics were correlated with clinical and radiographic findings.

[RESULTS] In cohort A, 31 of 36 patients (86.1%) had ctDNA collected ≤90 days before recurrence; of these, 25 of 31 patients (80.65%) were ctDNA-positive before recurrence. In cohort B, baseline ctDNA was available for 29 of 164 patients (17.68%), and all 29 were ctDNA-positive. Among 52 patients who had on-treatment ctDNA assessments, 62 treatment lines were analyzed (N = 6 in cohort A; N = 46 in cohort B). All who remained ctDNA-negative throughout treatment (Neg-Neg) showed treatment benefit (n = 6 of 6). Those who converted to ctDNA-positive (Neg-Pos) progressed (n = 2 of 2). Among ctDNA-positive patients (Pos-Pos), 27 of 40 (67.5%) showed treatment benefit, whereas 13 of 40 (32.5%) progressed. Patients who cleared ctDNA (Pos-Neg) had favorable outcomes (12 of 14 patients; 85.7%). A decrease >90% in ctDNA levels among Pos-Pos patients was linked to superior progression-fee survival. Grouping treatment lines into favorable (Neg-Neg, Pos-Neg, and Pos-Pos with >90% decrease) versus unfavorable (Neg-Pos and Pos-Pos with a <90% decrease or an increase) had significantly improved progression-free survival in the favorable group (p < .0001).

[CONCLUSIONS] ctDNA dynamics predicted progression and may guide treatment or imaging. ctDNA offers a minimally invasive, cost-effective adjunct to radiographic surveillance.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기