본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Follow-up Loss After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Incidence, Contributing Factors, and Survival Impact.

1/5 보강
The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi 📖 저널 OA 100% 2021: 1/1 OA 2024: 5/5 OA 2025: 9/9 OA 2026: 6/6 OA 2021~2026 2026 Vol.86(1) p. 33-42
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
435 patients, 137 (31.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The independent predictors of OS were FUL (HR=2.148, p=0.006) and pathologic stage (p<0.001). [CONCLUSIONS] FUL after a gastrectomy was associated with older age, absence of familial support, total gastrectomy, and was related to a poorer OS, particularly in stage I patients.

Kim TH, Park JH, Jeong SH, Kim DW, Kim YH, Kim HG, Cho JK, Kim JM, Kwag SJ, Ju YT, Jeong CY, Lee YJ

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] This study examined the incidence, causes, and survival outcomes of follow-up loss (FUL) after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p<0.001
  • p-value p=0.015
  • HR 0.927

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Kim TH, Park JH, et al. (2026). Follow-up Loss After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Incidence, Contributing Factors, and Survival Impact.. The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 86(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2025.111
MLA Kim TH, et al.. "Follow-up Loss After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Incidence, Contributing Factors, and Survival Impact.." The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, vol. 86, no. 1, 2026, pp. 33-42.
PMID 41572657 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND/AIMS] This study examined the incidence, causes, and survival outcomes of follow-up loss (FUL) after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

[METHODS] Patients who underwent a curative gastrectomy between January 2016 and May 2019 at a regional tertiary hospital were divided into two groups based on their follow-up (FU) adherence. Patients who maintained a regular FU throughout the five-year period were classified as the FU group, and those who failed to attend their scheduled visits for more than 12 consecutive months were grouped as the FUL group. Telephone interviews were conducted to identify the reasons for FU discontinuation and survival status. The sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared, and the independent predictors and survival outcomes were compared.

[RESULTS] Among the 435 patients, 137 (31.5%) were in the FUL group, and contact was successful in 131 patients (95.6%). The leading cause of FUL was death from non-gastric cancer causes (40.1%). Independent predictors of FUL were older age (hazard ratio [HR]=1.044, p<0.001), lower body mass index (BMI, HR=0.927, p=0.015), absence of familial support (HR=2.666, p=0.005), and total gastrectomy (HR=1.660, p=0.012). The BMI lost significance in sensitivity analysis (p=0.293). The overall survival (OS) was lower in the FUL group (p=0.0370), particularly for the stage I patients (p=0.046). The independent predictors of OS were FUL (HR=2.148, p=0.006) and pathologic stage (p<0.001).

[CONCLUSIONS] FUL after a gastrectomy was associated with older age, absence of familial support, total gastrectomy, and was related to a poorer OS, particularly in stage I patients.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기