Impact and effective management of nausea/vomiting on patients treated with zolbetuximab + chemotherapy: insights from the phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1072 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
In patients receiving steroids, including as antiemetic prophylaxis, mPFS was 10.5 months with zolbetuximab versus 8.3 months with placebo (0.66), and mOS was 18.4 versus 13.8 months (0.71). [CONCLUSION] Optimal antiemetic prophylaxis, with >3 drug classes including steroids, for zolbetuximab-associated nausea/vomiting is important for treatment adherence and maximal clinical benefits.
[BACKGROUND] In the phase III SPOTLIGHT (NCT03504397) and GLOW (NCT03653507) trials, nausea and/or vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy.
APA
Shitara K, Smyth E, et al. (2026). Impact and effective management of nausea/vomiting on patients treated with zolbetuximab + chemotherapy: insights from the phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies.. ESMO open, 11(2), 105931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.105931
MLA
Shitara K, et al.. "Impact and effective management of nausea/vomiting on patients treated with zolbetuximab + chemotherapy: insights from the phase III SPOTLIGHT and GLOW studies.." ESMO open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2026, pp. 105931.
PMID
41741112 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] In the phase III SPOTLIGHT (NCT03504397) and GLOW (NCT03653507) trials, nausea and/or vomiting were the most common adverse events in patients receiving zolbetuximab plus chemotherapy. We further characterize the adverse effects of nausea/vomiting on treatment adherence and efficacy, and evaluate strategies for managing nausea/vomiting through the SPOTLIGHT and GLOW combined analysis.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Ad hoc exploratory analyses included treatment discontinuations, antiemetic use, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after censoring patients with inadequate dose exposure (<75% relative exposure intensity) or early discontinuation (within 63 days) of zolbetuximab or placebo initiation.
[RESULTS] This combined analysis included 1072 patients. Nausea and/or vomiting (nausea/vomiting) were most common on the first zolbetuximab infusion day [nausea: 46.5% (246/529); vomiting: 41.0% (217/529)]; on the second infusion day, nausea dropped to 23.2% (97/418) and vomiting dropped to 24.4% (102/418). Nausea/vomiting continued to decline on subsequent infusion days. More patients on zolbetuximab versus placebo had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation [9.9% (53/537) versus 0.6% (3/535)]. More white than Asian patients had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation with zolbetuximab [15.4% (36/234) versus 4.7% (12/254)] and placebo [0.9% (2/224) versus 0.4% (1/255)]. Before censoring, median PFS (mPFS) (hazard ratio) for zolbetuximab versus placebo was 9.2 versus 8.2 months (0.71), and median OS (mOS) was 16.4 versus 13.7 months (0.77). After censoring, mPFS was 10.4 versus 8.2 months (0.65), and mOS was 17.9 versus 13.7 months (0.69). On the first zolbetuximab infusion day, patients without vomiting had higher utilization of three-drug prophylactic regimens than those with vomiting [75.3% (73/97) versus 24.7% (24/97)]. In patients receiving steroids, including as antiemetic prophylaxis, mPFS was 10.5 months with zolbetuximab versus 8.3 months with placebo (0.66), and mOS was 18.4 versus 13.8 months (0.71).
[CONCLUSION] Optimal antiemetic prophylaxis, with >3 drug classes including steroids, for zolbetuximab-associated nausea/vomiting is important for treatment adherence and maximal clinical benefits.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] Ad hoc exploratory analyses included treatment discontinuations, antiemetic use, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after censoring patients with inadequate dose exposure (<75% relative exposure intensity) or early discontinuation (within 63 days) of zolbetuximab or placebo initiation.
[RESULTS] This combined analysis included 1072 patients. Nausea and/or vomiting (nausea/vomiting) were most common on the first zolbetuximab infusion day [nausea: 46.5% (246/529); vomiting: 41.0% (217/529)]; on the second infusion day, nausea dropped to 23.2% (97/418) and vomiting dropped to 24.4% (102/418). Nausea/vomiting continued to decline on subsequent infusion days. More patients on zolbetuximab versus placebo had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation [9.9% (53/537) versus 0.6% (3/535)]. More white than Asian patients had nausea/vomiting leading to inadequate dose exposure or early discontinuation with zolbetuximab [15.4% (36/234) versus 4.7% (12/254)] and placebo [0.9% (2/224) versus 0.4% (1/255)]. Before censoring, median PFS (mPFS) (hazard ratio) for zolbetuximab versus placebo was 9.2 versus 8.2 months (0.71), and median OS (mOS) was 16.4 versus 13.7 months (0.77). After censoring, mPFS was 10.4 versus 8.2 months (0.65), and mOS was 17.9 versus 13.7 months (0.69). On the first zolbetuximab infusion day, patients without vomiting had higher utilization of three-drug prophylactic regimens than those with vomiting [75.3% (73/97) versus 24.7% (24/97)]. In patients receiving steroids, including as antiemetic prophylaxis, mPFS was 10.5 months with zolbetuximab versus 8.3 months with placebo (0.66), and mOS was 18.4 versus 13.8 months (0.71).
[CONCLUSION] Optimal antiemetic prophylaxis, with >3 drug classes including steroids, for zolbetuximab-associated nausea/vomiting is important for treatment adherence and maximal clinical benefits.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- Reply to: Key Considerations for the Lenvatinib-Pembrolizumab-Chemotherapy Regimen in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Insights From LEAP-015.
- Surrogate endpoints for survival in KEYNOTE-585: neoadjuvant/adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
- First-line zolbetuximab plus mFOLFOX6 and nivolumab in unresectable CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a phase 2 trial.
- New Perioperative Strategy in Gastric Cancer.
- Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy as Perioperative Therapy in Locally Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized, Phase III KEYNOTE-585 Study.
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
- Blocking SHP2 benefits FGFR2 inhibitor and overcomes its resistance in -amplified gastric cancer.
- Association of preoperative frailty and prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium in elderly gastric cancer patients: A single-center observational study.
- Complete response to Nivolumab-based chemotherapy in a case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events.
- Apatinib and silver nanoparticles synergize against gastric cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis.
- Correction: Survival disparities and predictors in gastric cancer: a population-based study from Kazakhstan (2012-2023).