본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Risk factors for missed early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on pathologically confirmed cases after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Surgical endoscopy 2026

Gu K, Gu T, Xie W, Bu H, Liu Y

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] A relatively high rate of early gastric cancer is missed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • OR 1.849

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Gu K, Gu T, et al. (2026). Risk factors for missed early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on pathologically confirmed cases after endoscopic submucosal dissection.. Surgical endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12600-3
MLA Gu K, et al.. "Risk factors for missed early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on pathologically confirmed cases after endoscopic submucosal dissection.." Surgical endoscopy, 2026.
PMID 41663751

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] A relatively high rate of early gastric cancer is missed during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with missed early gastric cancer (MEGC).

[METHODS] A retrospective study was conducted on 763 pathologically confirmed early gastric cancer lesions. Patients were categorized as initially detected early gastric cancer (IDEGC; no EGD in the previous 6-36 months) or MEGC (≥ 1 negative EGD in that interval). Independent risk factors for MEGC were identified through multivariable analysis.

[RESULTS] The MEGC rate was 22.0% (168/763). Independent risk factors were male sex (OR = 1.849) and endoscopists' age ≥ 45 years (OR = 2.737). Protective factors were lesion size ≥ 12 mm (OR = 0.616), sedation (OR = 0.376), observation time ≥ 5 min (OR = 0.625), and image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) technology application (OR = 0.316). MEGC causes were categorized into exposure errors (35.1%), perceptual errors (34.5%), sampling errors (29.2%), and inadequate preparation (1.2%). Errors types correlated with lesion locations. 50.6% of MEGC cases were deemed potentially avoidable. A higher annual endoscopist EGD volume was inversely correlated with the technically attributable MEGC rate (r = -0.495).

[CONCLUSION] MEGC risk may be reduced through targeted interventions for high-risk populations (male), optimized endoscopic examination protocols (ensuring adequate observation time, applying sedation and IEE technology), and enhanced training in advanced technologies for older endoscopists.

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)