Correlation of immune-inflammatory and tumor markers with lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
97 patients.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
radical gastrectomy
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSION] The combination of CEA, CA724, NLR, and IL-6 serves as an effective preoperative predictor of LNM in GC. The nomogram model based on these markers provides a reliable, non-invasive tool for individualized risk assessment and treatment planning.
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the combined predictive value of immune-inflammatory and tumor markers for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer (GC) patients.
- p-value P<0.001
- OR 1.24
APA
Wang YX, Zhou Y, et al. (2026). Correlation of immune-inflammatory and tumor markers with lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.. American journal of translational research, 18(3), 1999-2010. https://doi.org/10.62347/OHHU1152
MLA
Wang YX, et al.. "Correlation of immune-inflammatory and tumor markers with lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.." American journal of translational research, vol. 18, no. 3, 2026, pp. 1999-2010.
PMID
42007160 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[OBJECTIVE] To evaluate the combined predictive value of immune-inflammatory and tumor markers for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer (GC) patients.
[METHODS] We conducted a retrospective study of 207 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. Based on postoperative histology, patients were categorized into LNM and non-LNM groups. Preoperative serologic levels of markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA199), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA724), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) were collected. A nomogram prediction model was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Internal validation was performed using Bootstrap resampling, and external validation was conducted on an independent cohort of 97 patients.
[RESULTS] LNM was present in 55 (26.6%) patients in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative levels of CEA (odds ratio [OR]=1.52, P<0.001), CA724 (OR=1.24, P<0.001), NLR (OR=2.86, P<0.001), and IL-6 (OR=1.97, P<0.001) as independent risk factors for LNM. The nomogram model incorporating these four factors demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93. The model significantly outperformed conventional clinicopathologic indicators (P<0.001). Good calibration and clinical utility were confirmed by calibration curves and decision curve analysis, respectively. The model maintained strong predictive performance in both internal (AUC=0.92) and external (AUC=0.91) validation cohorts.
[CONCLUSION] The combination of CEA, CA724, NLR, and IL-6 serves as an effective preoperative predictor of LNM in GC. The nomogram model based on these markers provides a reliable, non-invasive tool for individualized risk assessment and treatment planning.
[METHODS] We conducted a retrospective study of 207 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. Based on postoperative histology, patients were categorized into LNM and non-LNM groups. Preoperative serologic levels of markers including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA199), carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA724), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) were collected. A nomogram prediction model was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Internal validation was performed using Bootstrap resampling, and external validation was conducted on an independent cohort of 97 patients.
[RESULTS] LNM was present in 55 (26.6%) patients in the training cohort. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative levels of CEA (odds ratio [OR]=1.52, P<0.001), CA724 (OR=1.24, P<0.001), NLR (OR=2.86, P<0.001), and IL-6 (OR=1.97, P<0.001) as independent risk factors for LNM. The nomogram model incorporating these four factors demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93. The model significantly outperformed conventional clinicopathologic indicators (P<0.001). Good calibration and clinical utility were confirmed by calibration curves and decision curve analysis, respectively. The model maintained strong predictive performance in both internal (AUC=0.92) and external (AUC=0.91) validation cohorts.
[CONCLUSION] The combination of CEA, CA724, NLR, and IL-6 serves as an effective preoperative predictor of LNM in GC. The nomogram model based on these markers provides a reliable, non-invasive tool for individualized risk assessment and treatment planning.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Advances in Targeted Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Tumors: From Trastuzumab to Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
- Blocking SHP2 benefits FGFR2 inhibitor and overcomes its resistance in -amplified gastric cancer.
- Association of preoperative frailty and prognostic nutritional index with postoperative delirium in elderly gastric cancer patients: A single-center observational study.
- Treating a single tumor deposits as two lymph node metastases can improve the accuracy of gastric cancer prognosis assessment.
- Complete response to Nivolumab-based chemotherapy in a case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events.
- Apatinib and silver nanoparticles synergize against gastric cancer through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated ferroptosis.