Efficacy of haemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding related to nonoperable advanced gastric cancer.
[BACKGROUND] Data on the efficacy of haemostatic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable gastric cancer bleeding are lacking.
- p-value p < 0.0001
APA
Boisteau E, Landrieux A, et al. (2026). Efficacy of haemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding related to nonoperable advanced gastric cancer.. Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology, 50(4), 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinre.2026.102803
MLA
Boisteau E, et al.. "Efficacy of haemostatic radiotherapy for bleeding related to nonoperable advanced gastric cancer.." Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology, vol. 50, no. 4, 2026, pp. 102803.
PMID
41819370
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Data on the efficacy of haemostatic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable gastric cancer bleeding are lacking.
[AIMS] To assess the efficacy of haemostatic RT, identify factors predictive of a response and analyse patient outcomes in this setting.
[METHODS] We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of haemostatic RT in patients with bleeding related to inoperable gastric cancer. A response was defined as no recurrence of external bleeding and no requirement for new blood transfusion after RT. Post-RT survival (PRTS) was defined as the time from the last day of RT to death, and event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from the last day of RT to rebleeding, transfusion requirement or death.
[RESULTS] Thirty-five patients were included, among whom 17 (48.6%) were responders. The mean number of packed red blood cells transfused per patient decreased significantly in the 3 months following RT in both responders (p < 0.0001) and nonresponders (p < 0.0001). The median PRTS and EFS were significantly greater in responders than in nonresponders (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). No patient died because of tumour bleeding in the responder group versus 3 in the nonresponder group (p = 0.23).
[CONCLUSION] Palliative RT for inoperable advanced gastric cancer bleeding is safe, improves patient outcomes and reduces the need for packed red blood cell transfusion.
[AIMS] To assess the efficacy of haemostatic RT, identify factors predictive of a response and analyse patient outcomes in this setting.
[METHODS] We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of haemostatic RT in patients with bleeding related to inoperable gastric cancer. A response was defined as no recurrence of external bleeding and no requirement for new blood transfusion after RT. Post-RT survival (PRTS) was defined as the time from the last day of RT to death, and event-free survival (EFS) was defined as the time from the last day of RT to rebleeding, transfusion requirement or death.
[RESULTS] Thirty-five patients were included, among whom 17 (48.6%) were responders. The mean number of packed red blood cells transfused per patient decreased significantly in the 3 months following RT in both responders (p < 0.0001) and nonresponders (p < 0.0001). The median PRTS and EFS were significantly greater in responders than in nonresponders (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). No patient died because of tumour bleeding in the responder group versus 3 in the nonresponder group (p = 0.23).
[CONCLUSION] Palliative RT for inoperable advanced gastric cancer bleeding is safe, improves patient outcomes and reduces the need for packed red blood cell transfusion.
MeSH Terms
Humans; Stomach Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Aged; Middle Aged; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Aged, 80 and over; Treatment Outcome; Palliative Care