Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears?

This study was undertaken to detect growth alterations after surgery for prominent ears. The cartilage excision technique was used in all 77 patients seen for follow-up. Two hundred students served as controls. Auricular measurements were done according to standardized guidelines of anthropometry. There was no significant difference between the retroauricular angle in the surgical group and in controls. The morphologic ear length in the surgical group was significantly smaller than in controls. Maximum ear length was significantly greater in men. Our measurements in the control group were significant below the reference values reported in the literature. Comparing the ear index of both groups with published data, we found a harmony between the width and the length of the ear. We could demonstrate that prominent ears were significantly larger in all other dimensions and that auricular growth does not stop following surgery for prominent ears with the cartilage excision method. We also evaluated subjective criteria such as tolerance to cold, scar formation, and patient satisfaction.