TACE Combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 Versus TACE Monotherapy as Conversion Therapy Before Liver Resection in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
liver resection (LR)
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions. [CONCLUSION] Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.
[BACKGROUND] Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor) is recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), and it
- 표본수 (n) 109
APA
Lu C, Liu R, et al. (2025). TACE Combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 Versus TACE Monotherapy as Conversion Therapy Before Liver Resection in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.. Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 12, 1527-1540. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S517855
MLA
Lu C, et al.. "TACE Combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 Versus TACE Monotherapy as Conversion Therapy Before Liver Resection in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matching Study.." Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, vol. 12, 2025, pp. 1527-1540.
PMID
40726616
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 inhibitor (PD-1 inhibitor) is recommended for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), and it has increased the probability of successful conversion. Our aim was to compare the clinical benefits of TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor versus TACE monotherapy as conversion therapy for patients with uHCC who subsequently underwent liver resection (LR).
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective study included 213 uHCC patients who underwent LR after receiving either TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (combination group, n=109) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n=104). Propensity score matching was employed to minimize baseline confounding variables between cohorts. Tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed between treatment arms.
[RESULTS] Among 68 matched pairs of patients who underwent LR, only 1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome. The combination group demonstrated superior treatment responses compared with the monotherapy group, with a significantly higher objective response rate (92.65% vs 80.88%, ) and pathological complete response rate (36.76% vs 11.76%, ). Furthermore, histopathological analyses revealed a lower incidence of microvascular invasion in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (14.71% vs 29.41%, ). Survival analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS (median not reached vs 20.0 months, ) and OS (median not reached for both, ) in the combination group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression identified preoperative monotherapy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (HR, 2.46) and OS (HR, 3.05). Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions.
[CONCLUSION] Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.
[MATERIALS AND METHODS] This retrospective study included 213 uHCC patients who underwent LR after receiving either TACE combined with Lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor (combination group, n=109) or TACE monotherapy (monotherapy group, n=104). Propensity score matching was employed to minimize baseline confounding variables between cohorts. Tumor response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed between treatment arms.
[RESULTS] Among 68 matched pairs of patients who underwent LR, only 1 patient developed small-for-size syndrome. The combination group demonstrated superior treatment responses compared with the monotherapy group, with a significantly higher objective response rate (92.65% vs 80.88%, ) and pathological complete response rate (36.76% vs 11.76%, ). Furthermore, histopathological analyses revealed a lower incidence of microvascular invasion in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group (14.71% vs 29.41%, ). Survival analyses demonstrated significantly improved DFS (median not reached vs 20.0 months, ) and OS (median not reached for both, ) in the combination group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression identified preoperative monotherapy as an independent adverse prognostic factor for both DFS (HR, 2.46) and OS (HR, 3.05). Although combination therapy showed superior therapeutic efficacy, it was linked to a significantly higher incidence of rash and hand-foot skin reactions.
[CONCLUSION] Compared to TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with Lenvatinib-PD-1 inhibitor as conversion therapy can improve long-term survival outcomes in patients with uHCC who undergo subsequent LR, with an acceptable safety profile.
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)
- The ASH HematOmics Program supports integrative analysis of genomic and clinical data in hematologic diseases.
- Immunosensors for dual tumor biomarker detection based on ternary electrochemiluminescence using confined CeO nanozyme as Co-reactant enhancers for luminol-O system.
- Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma therapy: critical considerations and future innovations.
- Opportunities and challenges of targeting cGAS-STING in cancer.
- zDHHC-mediated palmitoylation modification patterns and tumor immune microenvironment infiltration characterization in pancreatic cancer.