본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

The impact of BCLC recommendations on survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

1/5 보강
Hepatology communications 📖 저널 OA 95.1% 2025: 19/19 OA 2026: 20/22 OA 2025~2026 2025 Vol.9(8)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
798 patients with de novo HCC followed prospectively from 2006 to 2022: 187 in BCLC 0, 371 in A, 132 in B, 87 in C, and 21 in D, all managed by a multidisciplinary team.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] BCLC_2022 and CDM provide greater flexibility in clinical practice without adversely affecting patient survival. Access to curative treatments improves the outcomes of selected patients in all stages.

Iavarone M, Alimenti E, Canova L, Bruccoleri M, Antonelli B, Ierardi AM

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system for HCC was updated in 2022.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value p<0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Iavarone M, Alimenti E, et al. (2025). The impact of BCLC recommendations on survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.. Hepatology communications, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000750
MLA Iavarone M, et al.. "The impact of BCLC recommendations on survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.." Hepatology communications, vol. 9, no. 8, 2025.
PMID 40658790 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system for HCC was updated in 2022. The aim of the study was to assess the suitability and impact on overall survival (OS) of BCLC_2022, along with "clinical decision-making" (CDM), using BCLC_2018 as a benchmark.

[METHODS] We retrospectively evaluated 798 patients with de novo HCC followed prospectively from 2006 to 2022: 187 in BCLC 0, 371 in A, 132 in B, 87 in C, and 21 in D, all managed by a multidisciplinary team. Patients were followed until death or at the end of the follow-up period in December 2022.

[RESULTS] The suitability of the algorithm increased from 51% for BCLC_2018 to 69% for BCLC_2022 (p<0.001). Among those treated with the newly introduced "lower priority options," 22% were in BCLC 0 and 37% in A, showing lower rates of complete response (CR) and shorter OS compared to first-line treatments. In BCLC 0 and A, CDM was associated with a significant decrease in "downward stage migration" with BCLC_2022 (from 33% to 16%, p<0.001). Conversely, in BCLC B and C, "upward stage migration" correlated with higher CR rates and longer OS [63 (36-72) vs. 28 (18-44) months, p=0.003 in BCLC B; 21 (15-44) vs. 11 (4-25) months, p<0.001 in BCLC C]. Independent predictors of mortality included AFP >200 ng/mL, Child-Pugh score C, advanced BCLC stage, and noncurative treatment.

[CONCLUSIONS] BCLC_2022 and CDM provide greater flexibility in clinical practice without adversely affecting patient survival. Access to curative treatments improves the outcomes of selected patients in all stages.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (2)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기