A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose.

British journal of plastic surgery 1993 Vol.46(1) p. 7-12

Cussons PD, Murison MS, Fernandez AE, Pigott RW

관련 도메인

Abstract

There is a need to be able to assess the overall result in a significant series of cases of a method of management of the cleft lip and nose deformity in order to avoid "best case" reporting often used to introduce new techniques. The present study was performed by a panel placing standardised base view photographs in rank order. The photographs were of 10-year-old subjects of whom 15 were normal controls, 22 were from the Rikshospitalet, Oslo, all of whom had no primary nasal correction and 25 from Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, who all had radical primary nasal correction. Ranking was performed for upper nasal perimeter symmetry, nostril outline symmetry and for overall aesthetic appearance. Analysis of the results showed a significant difference between the three groups, with the corrected noses showing better symmetry. Inter and intraobserver correlations were very close. The limitations of a ranking and marking method of panel assessment are discussed, and a computerised method is presented in subsequent papers.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 nostril 콧방울 dict 1
해부 lip nose scispacy 1
해부 nose scispacy 1
질환 cleft lip nose C4759655
Congenital cleft nose
scispacy 1
질환 cleft lip C0008924
Cleft upper lip
scispacy 1
질환 nose deformity C0240547
Deformity of the nose
scispacy 1
질환 lip scispacy 1
기타 nasal scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Child; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Esthetics; Facial Asymmetry; Humans; Nose; Photography; Rhinoplasty; Surgery, Plastic; Time Factors

🔗 함께 등장하는 도메인

이 논문이 속한 카테고리와 같은 논문에서 자주 함께 다뤄지는 카테고리들

관련 논문