본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Follow-Up After Receiving Abnormal Results From Self-Sampled Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Underserved Patients.

1/5 보강
Cancer medicine 📖 저널 OA 95.5% 2022: 15/15 OA 2023: 14/14 OA 2024: 36/36 OA 2025: 164/164 OA 2026: 211/232 OA 2022~2026 2025 Vol.14(19) p. e71283
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: abnormal screening results should receive diagnostic follow-up care; optimizing this process is a challenge
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
abnormal results on a self-sampled cancer screening test
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Satisfaction with the self-sampling screening process was very high. These findings provide additional support for public health priorities to expand access to self-sampling cancer screening tests.

Moss JL, Bernacchi VE, Entenman J, Costigan H, Stuckey HL, Ruffin MT

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[INTRODUCTION] Increasing cancer screening through at-home self-sampling test modalities is a public health priority.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 5

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Moss JL, Bernacchi VE, et al. (2025). Follow-Up After Receiving Abnormal Results From Self-Sampled Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Underserved Patients.. Cancer medicine, 14(19), e71283. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71283
MLA Moss JL, et al.. "Follow-Up After Receiving Abnormal Results From Self-Sampled Colorectal and Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Among Underserved Patients.." Cancer medicine, vol. 14, no. 19, 2025, pp. e71283.
PMID 41014016 ↗
DOI 10.1002/cam4.71283

Abstract

[INTRODUCTION] Increasing cancer screening through at-home self-sampling test modalities is a public health priority. Patients with abnormal screening results should receive diagnostic follow-up care; optimizing this process is a challenge. We conducted a mixed methods study to examine the cancer screening process among underserved patients who received abnormal results on a self-sampled cancer screening test.

[METHODS] Participants were drawn from a parent study examining the impact of self-sampled colorectal and cervical cancer screening tests among patients at federally qualified health centers in Pennsylvania. Those who had received abnormal results on their screening were completed a survey and semi-structured interview about their experience (n = 5). We conducted mixed methods analysis to examine participants' (1) understanding and follow-up care for abnormal results and (2) satisfaction with the self-sampling cancer screening process.

[RESULTS] Quantitatively, participants indicated very high satisfaction with each self-sampled cancer screening, and 60% preferred a self-sampled test for their next cancer screening. Qualitatively, participants differed in the extent to which they seemed to understand their screening results, but they were generally satisfied with the self-sampling process. In mixed methods analysis, participants' baseline knowledge about cancer screening supported better understanding of abnormal screening results, and participants' preference for their next cancer screening was related to their experiences with self-sampling.

[CONCLUSIONS] Among this sample of patients who received abnormal results on their self-sampled colorectal or cervical cancer screening test, knowledge and understanding were not prerequisites for accessing follow-up care. Satisfaction with the self-sampling screening process was very high. These findings provide additional support for public health priorities to expand access to self-sampling cancer screening tests.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기