본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Class-Specific Effects of ARBs Versus ACE Inhibitors on Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes in MASLD.

1/5 보강
International journal of molecular sciences 📖 저널 OA 100% 2025 Vol.26(20)
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
143 participants with exclusive use of either an ACEI or ARB.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
ARB use was associated with improved survival and reduced cardiovascular events in individuals with MASLD, whereas ACEIs expressed no comparable benefit. These findings suggest that ARBs might be a more effective RAS inhibitor subclass in MASLD and support their preferential use in patients with steatotic liver disease requiring antihypertensive therapy.

Ryu T, Seo YJ, Lee J, Han JW, Yang H, Yang K

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), have been associated with improved outcomes in metabo

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 95% CI 0.90-1.00

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Ryu T, Seo YJ, et al. (2025). Class-Specific Effects of ARBs Versus ACE Inhibitors on Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes in MASLD.. International journal of molecular sciences, 26(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262010061
MLA Ryu T, et al.. "Class-Specific Effects of ARBs Versus ACE Inhibitors on Survival and Cardiovascular Outcomes in MASLD.." International journal of molecular sciences, vol. 26, no. 20, 2025.
PMID 41155354

Abstract

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), have been associated with improved outcomes in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We aimed to assess the differential impact of ACEIs versus ARBs on survival and cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with MASLD. Using data from the UK Biobank, we identified 52,143 participants with exclusive use of either an ACEI or ARB. Individuals with viral, autoimmune, cholestatic, or alcohol-related liver disease were excluded. MASLD was defined as fatty liver index ≥ 60 with ≥1 cardiometabolic risk factor. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounders. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. Among MASLD participants, ARB use was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality compared to ACEI use (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00; = 0.031) after IPTW adjustment. Cardiovascular risk was also lower with ARBs (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.96; < 0.001), particularly in subgroups with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m, no diabetes, and advanced fibrosis. No differences in hepatic decompensation or HCC incidence were observed. Benefits of ARBs were not significant in participants without steatotic liver disease. ARB use was associated with improved survival and reduced cardiovascular events in individuals with MASLD, whereas ACEIs expressed no comparable benefit. These findings suggest that ARBs might be a more effective RAS inhibitor subclass in MASLD and support their preferential use in patients with steatotic liver disease requiring antihypertensive therapy.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH

🟢 PMC 전문 열기