Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the current evidence.
메타분석
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
환자: resectable HCC, achieving moderate pathological responses and high resection rates
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
Corresponding pooled event rates were 19% for MPR, 35% for ORR, 22% for pCR, 81% for resection feasibility, and 19% for severe TRAEs. [CONCLUSION] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy appears to be a feasible and safe approach in patients with resectable HCC, achieving moderate pathological responses and high resection rates.
[BACKGROUND] Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide.
- 95% CI 0.19-0.41
- 연구 설계 meta-analysis
APA
Cicerone O, Oliviero B, et al. (2025). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the current evidence.. World journal of clinical oncology, 16(10), 110511. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i10.110511
MLA
Cicerone O, et al.. "Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis of the current evidence.." World journal of clinical oncology, vol. 16, no. 10, 2025, pp. 110511.
PMID
41178932 ↗
Abstract 한글 요약
[BACKGROUND] Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Despite improvements in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, long-term outcomes after liver resection are limited by high recurrence rates. While adjuvant strategies have shown limited benefit, the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable HCC is still under investigation.
[AIM] To assess the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable HCC through a meta-analysis of current literature.
[METHODS] A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies published in the past five years evaluating neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable HCC. Primary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), overall response rate (ORR), resection rate, and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using log odds ratios (ORs) and pooled event rates were calculated to provide absolute estimates of clinical endpoints.
[RESULTS] Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled ORs were 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19-0.41) for MPR, 0.54 (95%CI: 0.25-1.14) for ORR, 0.26 (95%CI: 0.11-0.66) for pCR, 5.37 (95%CI: 2.70-10.66) for resection rate, and 0.33 (95%CI: 0.22-0.50) for grade 3-4 TRAEs. Corresponding pooled event rates were 19% for MPR, 35% for ORR, 22% for pCR, 81% for resection feasibility, and 19% for severe TRAEs.
[CONCLUSION] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy appears to be a feasible and safe approach in patients with resectable HCC, achieving moderate pathological responses and high resection rates.
[AIM] To assess the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable HCC through a meta-analysis of current literature.
[METHODS] A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus for studies published in the past five years evaluating neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable HCC. Primary endpoints included major pathological response (MPR), pathological complete response (pCR), overall response rate (ORR), resection rate, and grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using log odds ratios (ORs) and pooled event rates were calculated to provide absolute estimates of clinical endpoints.
[RESULTS] Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled ORs were 0.28 (95%CI: 0.19-0.41) for MPR, 0.54 (95%CI: 0.25-1.14) for ORR, 0.26 (95%CI: 0.11-0.66) for pCR, 5.37 (95%CI: 2.70-10.66) for resection rate, and 0.33 (95%CI: 0.22-0.50) for grade 3-4 TRAEs. Corresponding pooled event rates were 19% for MPR, 35% for ORR, 22% for pCR, 81% for resection feasibility, and 19% for severe TRAEs.
[CONCLUSION] Neoadjuvant immunotherapy appears to be a feasible and safe approach in patients with resectable HCC, achieving moderate pathological responses and high resection rates.
🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만
같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (1)
🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반
- Raman Spectroscopic Signatures of Hepatic Carcinoma: Progress and Future Prospect.
- SLC2A1 tumour-associated macrophages spatially control CD8 T cell function and drive resistance to immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.
- Distribution of Immune Cells in Tumor Microenvironment Correlates With Checkpoint Inhibitor Response in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Multiregional Study.
- Heat Shock Protein 47 as a Novel Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarker for Thrombosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Safety Under an Immunosuppression-Preserving Strategy.
- Crosstalk Between -Regulatory Elements and Metabolism Reprogramming in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.