Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.
【연구 목적】 남성에서 여성으로 성전환 수술을 받은 환자들에서 음경 피부만 이용한 음경 피부 역전법과 음경 및 음낭 피부 피판을 이용한 음낭 피판법 중 어느 방법이 미용적 및 기능적 결과에서 더 우수한지 비교 평가하고자 하였다.
APA
van Noort DE, Nicolai JP (1993). Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 91(7), 1308-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199306000-00018
MLA
van Noort DE, et al.. "Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.." Plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 91, no. 7, 1993, pp. 1308-15.
PMID
8497532
Abstract
Twenty-seven male-to-female transsexuals underwent genital transformation. The cosmetic and functional results of 11 vagina constructions using only inverted penile skin were compared with 16 constructions using penile and scrotal skin flaps. Subjective (interview) and objective (physical examination) results are presented. The main conclusions are that vaginal width and subjective evaluation of functional aspects were clearly better after penile and scrotal skin inversion, especially when there was adequate dilatation by the patient. In addition, fewer complications were encountered. Cosmesis was judged better in the penile skin inversion group.
추출된 의학 개체 (NER)
| 유형 | 영어 표현 | 한국어 / 풀이 | UMLS CUI | 출처 | 등장 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 해부 | genital
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | vagina
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | penile skin
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 해부 | penile
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 합병증 | vaginal
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 질환 | transsexuals
|
C0558141
Transsexual (finding)
|
scispacy | 1 | |
| 기타 | vagina
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | scrotal skin flaps
|
scispacy | 1 | ||
| 기타 | scrotal skin
|
scispacy | 1 |
MeSH Terms
Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Patient Satisfaction; Penis; Postoperative Complications; Surgery, Plastic; Surgical Flaps; Transsexualism; Vagina