본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery 1993 Vol.91(7) p. 1308-15

van Noort DE, Nicolai JP

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

【연구 목적】 남성에서 여성으로 성전환 수술을 받은 환자들에서 음경 피부만 이용한 음경 피부 역전법과 음경 및 음낭 피부 피판을 이용한 음낭 피판법 중 어느 방법이 미용적 및 기능적 결과에서 더 우수한지 비교 평가하고자 하였다.

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA van Noort DE, Nicolai JP (1993). Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 91(7), 1308-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199306000-00018
MLA van Noort DE, et al.. "Comparison of two methods of vagina construction in transsexuals.." Plastic and reconstructive surgery, vol. 91, no. 7, 1993, pp. 1308-15.
PMID 8497532

Abstract

Twenty-seven male-to-female transsexuals underwent genital transformation. The cosmetic and functional results of 11 vagina constructions using only inverted penile skin were compared with 16 constructions using penile and scrotal skin flaps. Subjective (interview) and objective (physical examination) results are presented. The main conclusions are that vaginal width and subjective evaluation of functional aspects were clearly better after penile and scrotal skin inversion, especially when there was adequate dilatation by the patient. In addition, fewer complications were encountered. Cosmesis was judged better in the penile skin inversion group.

추출된 의학 개체 (NER)

유형영어 표현한국어 / 풀이UMLS CUI출처등장
해부 genital scispacy 1
해부 vagina scispacy 1
해부 penile skin scispacy 1
해부 penile scispacy 1
합병증 vaginal scispacy 1
질환 transsexuals C0558141
Transsexual (finding)
scispacy 1
기타 vagina scispacy 1
기타 scrotal skin flaps scispacy 1
기타 scrotal skin scispacy 1

MeSH Terms

Adult; Female; Humans; Male; Patient Satisfaction; Penis; Postoperative Complications; Surgery, Plastic; Surgical Flaps; Transsexualism; Vagina