본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transarterial Bland Embolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study of 980 Patients.

1/5 보강
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR 📖 저널 OA 8.8% 2021: 0/1 OA 2022: 0/1 OA 2023: 2/4 OA 2024: 0/2 OA 2025: 2/16 OA 2026: 1/32 OA 2021~2026 2025 Vol.36(11) p. 1812-1819
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
Subgroup analysis was performed among patients according to the Up-to-7 criteria.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
among patients according to the Up-to-7 criteria
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
The TACE group had a significantly higher overall response rate than the TAE group (33% vs 26%, P < .001). [CONCLUSIONS] TACE resulted in a higher response rate and longer OS compared with TAE as the initial treatment for intermediate-stage HCC.

Zhang H, Xu J, Meng H, Shen L

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] To assess the effectiveness of transarterial bland embolization (TAE) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy in the treatment of patients with intermediate-stage hepato

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • p-value P < .001
  • 95% CI 0.474-0.653

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Zhang H, Xu J, et al. (2025). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transarterial Bland Embolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study of 980 Patients.. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, 36(11), 1812-1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.06.014
MLA Zhang H, et al.. "Comparison of the Effectiveness of Transarterial Bland Embolization and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matched Study of 980 Patients.." Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR, vol. 36, no. 11, 2025, pp. 1812-1819.
PMID 41135980 ↗

Abstract

[PURPOSE] To assess the effectiveness of transarterial bland embolization (TAE) compared with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy in the treatment of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

[MATERIALS AND METHODS] A total of 2,031 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were screened, and 1,246 patients who underwent TAE or TACE as the first-choice treatment were retrospectively analyzed and baseline-matched according to the 2 treatment methods. Subgroup analysis was performed among patients according to the Up-to-7 criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

[RESULTS] A total of 1,246 patients with HCC who underwent TAE or TACE were included; 720 patients underwent TACE, and 526 underwent TAE. The patients in the TAE group exhibited poorer liver function and a significantly higher rate of hepatitis B infection (P < .001) compared with the TACE group. After propensity score matching, 490 well-matched pairs of patients with intermediate-stage HCC were selected for analysis. Univariate analysis showed that TACE significantly prolonged patient survival compared with TAE (P < .001). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 75.9%, 58.9%, and 44.9% for the TACE group and 59.2%, 34.9%, and 23.8% for the TAE group. Multivariate analysis showed a hazard ratio of 0.556 (95% CI, 0.474-0.653; P < .001) for the TACE approach over the TAE approach for OS. The TACE group had a significantly higher overall response rate than the TAE group (33% vs 26%, P < .001).

[CONCLUSIONS] TACE resulted in a higher response rate and longer OS compared with TAE as the initial treatment for intermediate-stage HCC.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (5)

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반