본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluating plasma and tissue biopsy for DNA methylation markers in early colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.

메타분석 1/5 보강
Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news 2025 Vol.19(5) p. 266-280
Retraction 확인
출처

Olorosisimo HET, Sumperos CG, Adviento ALA, Lachica AAT, Cabalteja JLA, Ubiña AGR

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[BACKGROUND] DNA methylation markers are emerging as promising diagnostic tools for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) that can significantly improve survival rates.

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • Sensitivity 40%
  • Specificity 69%

이 논문을 인용하기

↓ .bib ↓ .ris
APA Olorosisimo HET, Sumperos CG, et al. (2025). Evaluating plasma and tissue biopsy for DNA methylation markers in early colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.. Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 19(5), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.2478/abm-2025-0029
MLA Olorosisimo HET, et al.. "Evaluating plasma and tissue biopsy for DNA methylation markers in early colorectal cancer detection: a systematic review.." Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, vol. 19, no. 5, 2025, pp. 266-280.
PMID 41311876 ↗

Abstract

[BACKGROUND] DNA methylation markers are emerging as promising diagnostic tools for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) that can significantly improve survival rates.

[OBJECTIVE] To compare the capabilities of blood plasma and tissue biopsy for detecting these markers in early CRC stages by diagnostic measures.

[METHODS] Nine studies published from 2020 to 2024 were analyzed, and the study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

[RESULTS] This review reaffirms tissue-based samples as the gold standard based on the superior sensitivity and specificity with markers such as SFMBT2 being over 90% in the 2 parameters. However, due to its invasive nature, it challenges applicability for asymptomatic patients or routine screening. Plasma-based markers (SEPT9 and HAND1) offer a noninvasive alternative, with moderate sensitivity (40%-75.8%) and high specificity (69%-94.7%), while combining multiple markers improves overall diagnostic performance. However, most plasma-based assays evaluated in this review do not yet meet the 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approval benchmarks of ≥74% sensitivity and ≥90% specificity compared with colonoscopy, which shows the need for further optimization before its clinical implementation. QUADAS-2 illustrated a potential high risk of bias in patient selection and flow/timing domains, which underscores the need for more standardized diagnostic workflows and assay protocols.

[CONCLUSIONS] Future research should focus on multi-marker panels, adherence to regulatory thresholds, cost-effectiveness analyses, and clear clinical management pathways to facilitate the widespread implementation of plasma-based CRC screening.

🏷️ 키워드 / MeSH 📖 같은 키워드 OA만

🏷️ 같은 키워드 · 무료전문 — 이 논문 MeSH/keyword 기반

🟢 PMC 전문 열기