본문으로 건너뛰기
← 뒤로

Evaluating the short-term outcome of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.

1/5 보강
Surgery today 2025 Vol.55(11) p. 1621-1628
Retraction 확인
출처

PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 3/4)

유사 논문
P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
63 patients who underwent Lap-PE between January 2013 and December 2023.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
Lap-PE between January 2013 and December 2023
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
R0 resection was achieved in 95.1% of primary cases and 81.8% of recurrent cases (p = 0.10). [CONCLUSION] Lap PE for LRRC, when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgical team with careful patient selection, was shown to be safe, with comparable short-term outcomes to those of PE for primary rectal cancer and an acceptable R0 resection rate.

Ozaki K, Mukai T, Ando Y, Noguchi T, Sakamoto T, Matsui S, Yamaguchi T, Akiyoshi T

📝 환자 설명용 한 줄

[PURPOSE] Pelvic exenteration (PE) is sometimes the only curative option for primary rectal cancer as well as locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

🔬 핵심 임상 통계 (초록에서 자동 추출 — 원문 검증 권장)
  • 표본수 (n) 41
  • p-value p = 0.001

이 논문을 인용하기

BibTeX ↓ RIS ↓
APA Ozaki K, Mukai T, et al. (2025). Evaluating the short-term outcome of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.. Surgery today, 55(11), 1621-1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03048-4
MLA Ozaki K, et al.. "Evaluating the short-term outcome of laparoscopic pelvic exenteration in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer.." Surgery today, vol. 55, no. 11, 2025, pp. 1621-1628.
PMID 40464924

Abstract

[PURPOSE] Pelvic exenteration (PE) is sometimes the only curative option for primary rectal cancer as well as locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, data on laparoscopic PE (Lap-PE) for LRRC are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the technical safety of Lap-PE in LRRC cases.

[METHODS] We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients who underwent Lap-PE between January 2013 and December 2023. Patients were categorized into primary (n = 41) and recurrent (n = 22) groups, and short-term outcomes, including operative details and postoperative complications, were compared.

[RESULTS] The recurrent group had a significantly higher number of cases of multiple organs resected beyond PE (24.4% vs. 63.6%, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the operative time (714 vs. 633 min, p = 0.91) or blood loss (650 vs. 580 g, p = 0.98) between the groups. Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 complications occurred in 29.3% of primary cases and 18.2% of recurrent cases (p = 0.47). R0 resection was achieved in 95.1% of primary cases and 81.8% of recurrent cases (p = 0.10).

[CONCLUSION] Lap PE for LRRC, when performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgical team with careful patient selection, was shown to be safe, with comparable short-term outcomes to those of PE for primary rectal cancer and an acceptable R0 resection rate.

MeSH Terms

Humans; Rectal Neoplasms; Pelvic Exenteration; Laparoscopy; Female; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Aged; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Time Factors; Operative Time; Aged, 80 and over; Adult; Blood Loss, Surgical; Safety

같은 제1저자의 인용 많은 논문 (3)