Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
1/5 보강
PICO 자동 추출 (휴리스틱, conf 2/4)
유사 논문P · Population 대상 환자/모집단
928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.
I · Intervention 중재 / 시술
추출되지 않음
C · Comparison 대조 / 비교
추출되지 않음
O · Outcome 결과 / 결론
[CONCLUSIONS] Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.
[BACKGROUND] The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting
- p-value P < 0.001
APA
Hasjim BJ, Paukner M, et al. (2026). Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.. Transplantation, 110(1), e204-e216. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005536
MLA
Hasjim BJ, et al.. "Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.." Transplantation, vol. 110, no. 1, 2026, pp. e204-e216.
PMID
41082247
Abstract
[BACKGROUND] The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.
[METHODS] This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.
[RESULTS] Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era ( P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality ( P > 0.05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.
[METHODS] This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.
[RESULTS] Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era ( P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality ( P > 0.05).
[CONCLUSIONS] Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.